Showing posts with label Northern Territory. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Northern Territory. Show all posts

Thursday, 1 September 2016

MALDIVES: Trouble In Maldive Tourism

Maldives jihadists released a video warning leaders of the Maldives to adopt strict sharia law.
IT’S supposed to be a rich tourist’s perfect paradise, but increasingly, the Maldives’ credibility as a tropical dream is being overshadowed by the spectre of a terrorist nightmare.

The country famed for white sands and laid back locals is teetering on the edge of a coup with unrest and the threat of Islamic State terrorism set to see paradise turn ugly.

The Maldives is painted as a picture-prefect haven for tourists — many of them rich Western Europeans escaping the winter.

But increasing internal political turmoil and hard line radicalisation has the country at tipping point.

There is civil unrest as democratically-elected President Abdulla Yameen continues to lose support, and as more locals leave the Muslim country to fight in the Middle East with Islamic State and other militant outfits.

An estimated 200 Maldivians have done this, which would make the Maldives the largest foreign contributor of fighters on a per-capita basis. It’s a figure disputed by Yameen, who says the number is closer to 50 — despite the fact his government last week asked India for help sharing intelligence in light of an increasing threat form IS.

Whatever the numbers, terrorism experts say the figure is concerning, given the small population.

If there was to be a single terrorist attack on one of the luxury resorts, the billion dollar tourist industry would topple.

“It makes me very, very scared to see what is happening there,” Azra Naseem, who was born in the Maldives and now specialises in researching Islamist radicalism at Dublin University, said.

She said the government was afraid if the number of people leaving to become foreign fighters became public, it would harm the country’s exclusive tourism industry.

“Rich Western Europeans, towards whom most of the Maldives’ tourism is geared, would not want to book expensive holidays in a country known for the production of jihad,” she said.

“If the tourism industry is damaged, the minuscule percentage of rich Maldivians who control it would suffer, and many of them bankroll the government. So the current regimen downplays the number of jihadists, pretends it is a problem that does not exist and labels anyone who speaks about it a traitor.”

She said, the Maldives, which adopted Islam when Arab traders came to the islands in the 12th century, had never really distinguished between the Shia and Sunni sects of Isla, blending island traditions and Islam.

“And now the only Islam that is being accepted is Saudi Salafism,” she says.

Almost half the Maldivian population of 300,000 lives on the island capital of Male.

Unemployment and drug use is high. Few Maldivians work in the resorts, which are on islands uninhabited by locals. They tend to be managed by Europeans and Australians and staffed mainly by tens of thousands of poorly-paid Bangladeshis.

While the government has been diligent in cracking down on political opponents, it has done little to halt the flow of Maldivians heading off to fight for Islamic State.

There have been whole families who have gone over,” says Naseem. “There has been a Maldivian baby born in Syria.”

When Islamic State first emerged, the stories of people going off to fight would be reported in local newspapers as their families proudly talked of their bravery.

Naseem says the government seems to have cracked down on the publication of such reports, but “it doesn’t mean that people aren’t still going”.

Terrorism experts say the problem is what happens if some of these Maldivian jihadists, trained and radicalised on the battlefields of Syria, come home.

Maldivian jihadists recently posted a video on a website with the pictures of the three most recent Maldivian presidents — including Yameen — depicting the presidents being shot.

The video said it was a warning for the leadership of the Maldives to adopt strict sharia law.

It’s a stark contract to the idyllic weather, beaches and tropical fish showcased as the ultimate Maldives holiday.

Experts say the country’s 100-plus luxury resorts are ‘soft’ terrorism targets.

Meanwhile Yameen is trying to pacify Islamic interests, safeguard his leadership, and protect than economy where 70 per cent of the economy is directly reliant on tourism.

The result is building opposition towards him, and the growing threat of a coup.

The Maldives became a democracy in 2008 when Mohamed Nasheed became its first freely-elected leader, ending three decades of autocratic rule under Mr Yameen’s half-brother, Maumoon Abdul Gayoom.

Since Yameen came to power in 2013, he has enacted a series of increasingly draconian laws.

Under his rule, hundreds of political activists have faced charges and several senior figures have been given long jail sentences including Mr Nasheed, who was painted as anti-Islamic, and now lives in self-imposed exile in the UK.

Last weekend, reports emerged that a group of exiled opposition leaders — including Nasheed — had met in Sri Lanka planning how to oust him.

Protests have become frequent in the past year amid fears Yameen will return the Maldives to its more repressive past.

Last month strict defamation laws, with punishments for comments or actions considered insulting to Islam and tighter restrictions on demonstrations came into effect.

Yameen plans to bring back the death penalty — after a 60-year unofficial moratorium — and capital punishment as a way of proving his “Islamic credentials’, a move which has drawn criticism from the UN, the UK, the EU and the US.

While the Maldives relies heavily on its billion-dollar tourism industry, that same industry promotes a feeling of inequality. Some locals resent the wealthy foreigners. Even more resent the uneven distribution of the proceeds of tourism.

The internal power struggle, combined with the increased terrorism fears, haven't hit the tourist trade.

But on August 25, the BBC announced it had received information that a move to oust the president is expected in the coming weeks.

About 7000 Australians travel to the Maldives every year, and the current Australian government travel warnings are to “exercise normal safety precautions” overall, but exercise “a high degree of caution in the capital, on Male Island, due to the possibility of civil unrest and the threat of terrorist attack.”

“Australians in the Maldives should avoid all demonstrations, protests, and large public gatherings, particularly in Male, as they may turn violent,” the government travel warning says.

“Australia and Australians are viewed by IS and other terrorist groups as a target for terrorist attacks. Even in cases where attacks may not specifically target Australian interests, Australians could be harmed in indiscriminate attacks or attacks aimed at others.”

Public observance of any religion other than Islam is prohibited in the Maldives and importation of non-Islamic religious material is illegal. In the past, foreigners have been expelled for allegedly engaging in religious preaching.

It’s at odds with the tourism brochure picture of tropical paradise perfection of year-round sun, an underwater wonderland, and rich tourists sipping cocktails on the country’s resort islands where alcohol and pork are allowed, bikinis are acceptable dress, and almost anything goes.



AUSTRALIA: Australia Tourism Bangs 7.2m Visitors

International visitors are flocking to Australia, with the latest figures showing a record 7.2 million people arrived last financial year.

The latest survey from Tourism Research Australia shows visitors came from far and wide, including Asia, the Pacific, the US and Europe.

While backpacker numbers to the Northern Territory, Queensland and Victoria were down Tasmania and the ACT both had more than a 10 per cent increase.

Monday, 26 October 2015

AUSTRALIA: Medical Tourism Created By Outdated Abortion Laws

Lack of legislative uniformity may be forcing some women to travel interstate, says Medical Journal of Australia, as tests for foetal abnormalities improve

Improved technology has made testing for foetal abnormalities easier and more accurate, but inconsistent state legislation means women do not have equal access to abortion should they choose to terminate their pregnancy as a result, an editorial published in the Medical Journal of Australia on Monday says.

The lead author of the piece, Prof Caroline de Costa, said foetal abnormality was specifically mentioned in abortion legislation in Western Australia, South Australia and the Northern Territory, and was covered by the decriminalisation of abortion in Victoria, Tasmania and the Australian Capital Territory.

But despite Medicare-funded diagnosis of foetal abnormality now routinely being offered to pregnant women – with the implication that abortion may be an option if detected – abortion laws in Queensland and New South Wales do not refer to foetal abnormality.
Planned Parenthood: no Australian aid goes to programs selling aborted foetal tissue
Read more

“The implication is that in those states, abortion for foetal abnormalities is illegal,” De Costa, an obstetrician and professor with James Cook University in Queensland, said. “The law has simply not kept up with medical developments.”

It meant when doctors carried out abortions for foetal abnormalities in Queensland and NSW, “we have to work our medical notes around the legislation”, De Costa said.

“We have to look at the mental health of woman and say it will be adversely affected without the abortion. That shouldn’t be happening, we should be able to say it’s because of the abnormality.”

Other doctors were too uncomfortable doing so and referred their patients elsewhere, she said. However, with the exception of Victoria, doctors with a conscientious objection to abortion did not have to refer patients. These factors were leading to extensive medical tourism to Victoria, De Costa said.

“Children by Choice, an organisation who give options for unplanned pregnancies, in the previous year sent 77 women from Queensland interstate for an abortion, and they’re not the only organisation doing that,” De Costa said.
Why we need to talk about abortion: eight women share their experiences
Read more

Other barriers were differences in the number of weeks in which women qualified for an abortion. Victoria offers the largest window, with a woman able to terminate her pregnancy at up to 24 weeks and with a doctor’s consent beyond that.

“In 2015, there is an urgent need for legislative uniformity across Australia so that law is in step with modern medical practice, and so that women, regardless of where they live, have equal access to abortion,” the editorial concluded.

Alexis Apostolellis, the Australian chief executive of Marie Stopes, a non-governmental organisation providing contraception and safe abortion services, said women throughout Australia should have equal right to choose how and when they have children.

“In order to enable a woman to have choice, legislation needs to remove barriers to her decision making,” Apostolellis said.

“Legislation needs to be fit to the times, and we support appropriate changes that enable women with a greater range of choices.”

The Queensland senator and Greens deputy leader, Larissa Waters, called on the state premier, Annastacia Palaszczuk, to bring the state’s abortion laws in line with Victoria’s.

“It’s incredibly disappointing that despite our gender-balanced state cabinet, the government is failing women by showing no signs of decriminalising abortion,” Waters said. “Our state’s abortion laws are the worst in the country.

“Women are only able to legally have an abortion in Queensland where a doctor finds their mental or physical health is at risk.

“Setting these legal hurdles limits the number of doctors who perform abortions and therefore restricts access, especially in regional areas.”