KENYA: Kenya Tourism Arrivals Shot Up In The Year 201

Kenya Tourism arrivals for the year 2016 shot up.
Mombasa was highest with a rise of 22.2 percent compared to the year 2015 with actual figures reaching 92.872 foreign arrivals through Moi International Airport, up from the previous year's 75.983.

In real terms though did Nairobi top coast figures with 782.013 arrivals, a rise of 16.2 percent and up from the 671.789 travelers entering through Jomo Kenyatta International Airport in 2015.

A regular source close to the Kenya Tourism Board however shared the challenge cruise tourism continues to pose as numbers for 2016 ended up below those the year earlier with only 2.717 cruise tourists entering through the port of Mombasa.

The building of a new dedicated cruise terminal however, and efforts to associate more closely with the Indian Ocean Vanilla Islands, which were hugely successful in 2016 to drive cruise passenger numbers up, appears to be a promising investment and strategy to have such cruises between the islands also call on mainland ports like Mombasa.

Arrivals from the US to Kenya, despite the lack of direct flights, reached 97,883 in 2016, overtaking the UK - as previously stated here - as Kenya's top source country for tourists. This is of particular importance vis a vis revenues as most American visitors come to Kenya for safari holidays and spend a lot more than tourists coming for beach vacations.

The US figure is up by more than 13.000, a sign that marketing Kenya as a premier safari tourism destination has been successful. The UK ended up second in the ranking list with only 96,404 arrivals for the year 2016, down by nearly 2.000 visitors and attributed to the fact that - despite the incentive packages launched by Kenya in early 2016 to stimulate a return of charter flights - not all those flights from the UK were restored.

India surprisingly turned out to become third largest market for Kenya with 64,116 arrivals last year, an increase of over 15.000 visitors compared to the 49,756 in 2015 while Uganda was fourth and leading African country with 51,023 up from 29,038 previously. Many of those visitors from Uganda are thought to be expatriates now taking advantage of Visa free Interstate Passes, inspite of periodic reports that Kenyan immigration officials hassle them.

China is the surprise fifth placed tourism market source and pushed Germany and Italy to position six and seven last year, with 47,860 compared to only 29,790. This rise is attributed to more flights from China to Kenya, both direct and indirect and in particular the Gulf airlines can take credit for this achievements besides national airline Kenya Airways and its main rival Ethiopian Airlines.

Tourists from the Germany in 2016 reached 43.502, up from 38,236 in 2015 but still had to yield the number five spot to China, again thought to be for not all charter flights being revived from that market.

Italy's arrivals climbed at an albeit slower pace to 35,953 compared to 33,415 in 2015 but also remained behind expectations with not enough seats available for Mombasa and in particular the Malindi market.

The South African market in contrast performed much better in 2016, almost catching the Italians with 35,926 arrivals last year compared with 30,500 in 2015.

Easing Visa regulations was seen as a major factor for that sharp rise after the tit for tat spats between the two countries over advance Visa requirements in previous years.

Notably did arrivals from neighbouring Tanzania only very marginally rise, thought to be rooted in the fact that the Tanzanian government had refused to join the East African common tourist Visa implemented between Uganda, Rwanda and Kenya and the facilitation of expatriate travel via Interstate Passes, a factor also sharply limiting travel into Tanzania by expats from the wider region who prefer Visa free travel among participating states.

For 2017 though have tourism sources already expressed their misgivings over the negative tone introduced for the upcoming August elections and voiced their concern that, should the rhetoric not be brought to civil levels, this could impact on the recovery of the sector at a crucial time.

'If the elections impact negatively on our sector's performance, it is the level of bad language which we have seen emerge over the past months. If tour operators abroad get scared away, fearing for the worst, is is the fault of our politicians who put themselves and not their country first.

If tourists get worried they stay away or look for alternatives. Jobs have slowly come back in the industry but far too slowly at the coast. Any diversion of tourism flows from Kenya to other countries will reverse our gains.

In fact some charters were put on a wait and see mode and might only resume if we as Kenyans can deliver a clean and peaceful election in August. This is our major challenge for the new year. The Kenya Tourism Board, unlike in the run up to the last elections when government did not give them enough money to run a major marketing campaign in core markets and emerging markets, will no doubt go out and sell the country, but buyers will keep an eye on the upcoming elections.

It is a chicken or egg question and we hope that politics will not get in the way of recovering the ground we lost since 2012' contributed a Nairobi based regular reader of this publication.

MALAYSIA: Visa Blunder Cost Malaysia ‘golden’ Chinese Tourists

Previous holiday periods had seen thousands of Chinese tourists visiting Malaysia.

Thousands of Chinese tourists are believed to have been unable to visit Malaysia from Oct 1 to 7, dubbed the “Golden Week” in China because of its national day, due to an alleged slip-up from the Home Ministry which failed to inform its Chinese counterparts of a visa-free facility.

This apparently led to the tourists being stopped at airports in China and told they could not leave for Malaysia as they did not have visas.

Tourism Malaysia chairman Wee Choo Keong, who disclosed this yesterday, said the Home Ministry only gave the green light on Sept 28 for the visa-free facility to be implemented, giving everyone concerned only 72 hours to prepare for the tourists.

“Chinese airport authorities were apparently unaware of the new facility and did not allow Chinese tourists to leave for Malaysia,” he said.

Wee said the poor preparation for the implementation of the visa-free facility had cost the country dearly as the tourists did not get to spend their money here.

“It was a week-long holiday for them and they would have been happy visiting Malaysia. But it turned out otherwise,’” he added.

The Golden Week has in the past seen thousands of Chinese tourists landing here over the period.

In June, Tourism and Culture Minister Datuk Seri Mohamed Nazri Aziz had announced the Cabinet had agreed to implement the visa-free facility that would allow Chinese tour groups to stay in Malaysia for 15 days from Sept 1.

But this was postponed to Oct 1 to ensure guidelines were in place.

Earlier yesterday, 37 Malaysia Inbound Tourism Association members told reporters they had incurred losses running into millions of ringgit because of the cancellation of bookings by Chinese tour groups.

Association secretary-general Mint Leong said travel agents in China had also decided to call off group tours because of problems related to the visa-free facility.

She said nearly 250 groups of 20 each was to have arrived here but most cancelled because of the hiccup.

She suggested the Home Ministry resolve the matter immediately so Chinese tourists continue to visit Malaysia.

“Our currency is not at its best, and we should be encouraging more Chinese tourists to spend their money in Malaysia as they are known to be the big spenders,” she said.

Leong also suggested the Home Ministry bring back the visa-on-arrival facility for Chinese tourists, which was halted last year.