A Peruvian judge has ordered ex-president Ollanta Humala and his wife Nadine Heredia held in pre-trial detention for allegedly accepting illegal campaign donations from Brazilian construction giant Odebrecht.
Humala and Heredia, who followed the televised 21-hour marathon hearing from home, surrendered to the judge on Thursday one hour after the ruling.
Judge Richard Concepcion Carhuancho ordered 18 months of pre-trial detention for the couple for the crime of money laundering against the interest of the state.
Humala, president 2011-2016, said the ruling is a confirmation of abuse of power, vowing on Twitter to face it head-on in defence of our rights.
Defense attorneys said the couple would immediatly file an appeal.
Grupo Odebrecht, Latin America's largest construction conglomerate, came under scrutiny during the probe of a massive pay-to-play scheme at Brazil's state oil company Petrobras that has tarnished the names of Brazil's top politicians and business executives.
The fallout spread across Latin America when Odebrecht executives admitted in plea bargains that a secret company bribery department systematically paid multi-million-dollar bribes to win public works contracts in 12 countries in the region.
The Brazilian construction giant admitted to paying $29 million in bribes in Peru to win government building contracts between 2005 and 2014 a time period that also includes the presidencies of Alejandro Toledo and Alan Garcia.
Toledo president from 2001-2006 is currently in the United States in defiance of an 18-month pre-trial detention order for allegedly receiving $20 million in Odebrecht bribes.
One of the main prosecution claims is that Humala and Heredia accepted $3 million from Odebrecht for the 2011 presidential campaign.
Humala denies the charge, though he says that Peruvian law does not forbid foreign campaign contributions.
The prosecution also claims that Humala accepted contributions from Venezuela during his failed 2006 presidential bid.
Tourism Observer
www.tourismobserver.com
Tourism, Travel, Hospitality, Conservation: News,Stories And Experiences From Allover The World
Showing posts with label Visit Peru. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Visit Peru. Show all posts
Friday, 21 July 2017
Thursday, 1 June 2017
PERU: Suspected Drug Traffickers Kill Two Policemen
Two Peruvian policemen were killed in an ambush on Wednesday by suspected drug traffickers in a remote Andean coca growing region, a regional police chief said on local radio.
The deaths come a week after Peru announced security forces would enter criminally controlled coca-growing areas for the first time as part of a plan to eradicate half the country's supply of the leaf used to make cocaine.
The police chief said the deaths occurred in Luricocha district in a region known as the VRAEM, where traffickers have formed alliances with remnant bands of Shining Path rebels and about 75 percent of Peru's coca is grown.
"They were returning from a road patrol when they were ambushed by alleged drug traffickers; there were six to eight attackers," Alexis Bahamonde, head of police in the VRAEM, said on RPP radio.
Peru and Andean neighbor Colombia are the world's biggest cocaine producers, according to the United Nations.
The government’s initiative to reduce coca producing areas by 50% appears to be having success, including an initiative to replace it with cacao. Are there more sides to the story?
In the past week, we have seen several big advancements in the coca eradication program that the incumbent government has put into place. First, Peru’s armed forces entered the rainforest valleys where the coca growers are concentrated.
Second, the National Commission for Development and Life without Drugs (DEVIDA) stated their goal of a 50% reduction in coca growing area by 2021.
Third and finally, in the valley of Bolson Cuchara near Tingo Maria, cacao has been introduced to replace coca leaves with considerable support, or some might say “pressure”, from DEVIDA.
As can be observed by the recent progression of news that has come out on the subject, there is a three-pronged attack on coca growing areas in Peru that is formed by the military, central government programs, and the introduction of a crop alternative for producers.
The allure for those producers who switch from coca to cacao, for example, is that of their work finally being under legal and formal conditions.
Another benefit reported by Telesur is the construction of infrastructure and the formal land titles those producers may receive once their business is legal and acceptable.
However, on another side of the debate, coca has been an important part of Peruvian culture for many centuries, if not millenniums, and some might consider these actions on part of the government rather heavy-handed and blind to this dimension.
That being said, the goal does not appear to be to eliminate all coca, as teas and other coca products are sold legally through Enaco,the National Coca Company in Peru.
Historically, however, it has been more profitable for growers to join the illegal market than to sell for the meager amount that Enaco pays per kilo, and so the government needs to seek other solutions apart from nationalizing the legal coca supply.
Is replacing it with cacao a good solution? Well, let’s be honest, the cacao business doesn’t have the most savory reputation either.
The last point is that it is well known in Peru that coca has often been misunderstood by foreigners for its connotation with the illegal drug cocaine, which is a highly condensed and processed form of the coca leaf.
Consumed naturally, it acts as a mild stimulant and has many medicinal properties including hunger and fatigue relief, altitude sickness, and stimulating stomach functions.
It is possible, maybe even probable, that much of the pressure to reduce or eliminate coca in Peru has come from foreign countries where the majority of cocaine consumption takes place rather than from within Peru where it is generally used as a medicinal herb or a mild stimulant.
This is, however, another theme with many economic and historic dimensions. There is so much more to the debate over coca to be taken into account than what we have covered here.
What do you think about the Coca plant and the government initiatives to reduce growing areas?
Are they right to do so, and to what extent?
The deaths come a week after Peru announced security forces would enter criminally controlled coca-growing areas for the first time as part of a plan to eradicate half the country's supply of the leaf used to make cocaine.
The police chief said the deaths occurred in Luricocha district in a region known as the VRAEM, where traffickers have formed alliances with remnant bands of Shining Path rebels and about 75 percent of Peru's coca is grown.
"They were returning from a road patrol when they were ambushed by alleged drug traffickers; there were six to eight attackers," Alexis Bahamonde, head of police in the VRAEM, said on RPP radio.
Peru and Andean neighbor Colombia are the world's biggest cocaine producers, according to the United Nations.
The government’s initiative to reduce coca producing areas by 50% appears to be having success, including an initiative to replace it with cacao. Are there more sides to the story?
In the past week, we have seen several big advancements in the coca eradication program that the incumbent government has put into place. First, Peru’s armed forces entered the rainforest valleys where the coca growers are concentrated.
Second, the National Commission for Development and Life without Drugs (DEVIDA) stated their goal of a 50% reduction in coca growing area by 2021.
Third and finally, in the valley of Bolson Cuchara near Tingo Maria, cacao has been introduced to replace coca leaves with considerable support, or some might say “pressure”, from DEVIDA.
As can be observed by the recent progression of news that has come out on the subject, there is a three-pronged attack on coca growing areas in Peru that is formed by the military, central government programs, and the introduction of a crop alternative for producers.
The allure for those producers who switch from coca to cacao, for example, is that of their work finally being under legal and formal conditions.
Another benefit reported by Telesur is the construction of infrastructure and the formal land titles those producers may receive once their business is legal and acceptable.
However, on another side of the debate, coca has been an important part of Peruvian culture for many centuries, if not millenniums, and some might consider these actions on part of the government rather heavy-handed and blind to this dimension.
That being said, the goal does not appear to be to eliminate all coca, as teas and other coca products are sold legally through Enaco,the National Coca Company in Peru.
Historically, however, it has been more profitable for growers to join the illegal market than to sell for the meager amount that Enaco pays per kilo, and so the government needs to seek other solutions apart from nationalizing the legal coca supply.
Is replacing it with cacao a good solution? Well, let’s be honest, the cacao business doesn’t have the most savory reputation either.
The last point is that it is well known in Peru that coca has often been misunderstood by foreigners for its connotation with the illegal drug cocaine, which is a highly condensed and processed form of the coca leaf.
Consumed naturally, it acts as a mild stimulant and has many medicinal properties including hunger and fatigue relief, altitude sickness, and stimulating stomach functions.
It is possible, maybe even probable, that much of the pressure to reduce or eliminate coca in Peru has come from foreign countries where the majority of cocaine consumption takes place rather than from within Peru where it is generally used as a medicinal herb or a mild stimulant.
This is, however, another theme with many economic and historic dimensions. There is so much more to the debate over coca to be taken into account than what we have covered here.
What do you think about the Coca plant and the government initiatives to reduce growing areas?
Are they right to do so, and to what extent?
Wednesday, 31 May 2017
PERU: Peru Is More Than Just Food
Starting January 1, tickets prices to visit the city of Machu Picchu in Cusco increased for foreign visitors.
This announcement came from Cusco’s culture department who made the decision last January as a way to ensure the adequate measures are implemented to meet the international standards and recommendations set by UNESCO.
The entrance fees for foreign tourists to the ancient city of Machu Picchu will have an increase of S/ 24 for adults and S/ 12 for university students.
Foreigners who enter the Llaqta Inka of Machu Picchu and also intend to visit the mountain of Wayna Picchu, Machu Picchu Mountain, Camino de las Fuentes and Inkaraqay Trail must pay an additional S/ 48.
The afternoon entrance to Machu Picchu, after 1 p.m., will increase by S/ 10 for adults and S/ 5 for foreign university students.
As for the Inca Trail Network, the adult rate for routes 1, 2, 3 and 4, will increase by S/ 38 and S/ 19 for students.
“Tourists operators were aware of the new prices since last January and had all year to adapt to the new rates,” said Vidal Pino, Director of the Culture Department in Cusco.
Peru’s ancient city of Machu Picchu was TripAdvisor’s Top 25 Landmarks top selection for 2016.
According to the world’s most popular travel site, Machu Picchu claimed the Travelers’ Choice 2016 Award, the most important prize granted by TripAdvisor.
Peru is more than just food
Peru’s Exports and Tourism Promotion Board (PromPeru) announced: “this important recognition is the outcome of intense efforts by PromPeru, which has allowed our country to position itself as an important destination for visitors year after year, through campaigns such as ‘Peru, land of hidden treasures’ and ‘Peru, to the world.’”
Here are the top 10 destinations (out of 25):
1. Machu Picchu, Cusco region (Peru)
2. Sheikh Zayed Mosque, Abu Dhabi (United Arab Emirates)
3. Angkor Wat, Siem Reap (Cambodia)
4. St. Peter’s Basilica, Vatican City (Italy)
5. Taj Mahal, Agra (India)
6. Mezquita Cathedral, Cordoba (Spain)
7. Church of the Savior on Spilled Blood, St. Petersburg (Russia)
8. The Alhambra, Granada (Spain)
9. Lincoln Memorial, Washington D.C. (United States)
10. Duomo di Milano (Italy)
TripAdvisor has highlighted the planet’s top landmarks based on the millions of reviews and opinions collected throughout the year from travelers from all over the globe.
This announcement came from Cusco’s culture department who made the decision last January as a way to ensure the adequate measures are implemented to meet the international standards and recommendations set by UNESCO.
The entrance fees for foreign tourists to the ancient city of Machu Picchu will have an increase of S/ 24 for adults and S/ 12 for university students.
Foreigners who enter the Llaqta Inka of Machu Picchu and also intend to visit the mountain of Wayna Picchu, Machu Picchu Mountain, Camino de las Fuentes and Inkaraqay Trail must pay an additional S/ 48.
The afternoon entrance to Machu Picchu, after 1 p.m., will increase by S/ 10 for adults and S/ 5 for foreign university students.
As for the Inca Trail Network, the adult rate for routes 1, 2, 3 and 4, will increase by S/ 38 and S/ 19 for students.
“Tourists operators were aware of the new prices since last January and had all year to adapt to the new rates,” said Vidal Pino, Director of the Culture Department in Cusco.
Peru’s ancient city of Machu Picchu was TripAdvisor’s Top 25 Landmarks top selection for 2016.
According to the world’s most popular travel site, Machu Picchu claimed the Travelers’ Choice 2016 Award, the most important prize granted by TripAdvisor.
Peru is more than just food
Peru’s Exports and Tourism Promotion Board (PromPeru) announced: “this important recognition is the outcome of intense efforts by PromPeru, which has allowed our country to position itself as an important destination for visitors year after year, through campaigns such as ‘Peru, land of hidden treasures’ and ‘Peru, to the world.’”
Here are the top 10 destinations (out of 25):
1. Machu Picchu, Cusco region (Peru)
2. Sheikh Zayed Mosque, Abu Dhabi (United Arab Emirates)
3. Angkor Wat, Siem Reap (Cambodia)
4. St. Peter’s Basilica, Vatican City (Italy)
5. Taj Mahal, Agra (India)
6. Mezquita Cathedral, Cordoba (Spain)
7. Church of the Savior on Spilled Blood, St. Petersburg (Russia)
8. The Alhambra, Granada (Spain)
9. Lincoln Memorial, Washington D.C. (United States)
10. Duomo di Milano (Italy)
TripAdvisor has highlighted the planet’s top landmarks based on the millions of reviews and opinions collected throughout the year from travelers from all over the globe.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)