Showing posts with label east african community. Show all posts
Showing posts with label east african community. Show all posts

Tuesday, 12 July 2016

KENYA: Country Citizens That Can Visit Kenya With No Visa

As tourist visas in East African Community countries increase by day, there is still good news. If you are from the countries below, you are still safe. The Kenyan government started the system of issuing visa online where a user has to first register. This system together with the paper system will work until the 31st August 2015. There after, all the applications will have to be made online.
The following countries have concluded visa abolition agreement with Kenya:

- Ethiopia
- San Marino

Visa fees for Kenya
a) Single entry $50.00
b) Multiple entry $100.00
c) East African $100.00 – allow travel between Kenya, Rwanda and Uganda with the same multiple entry visa.The holder of the East Africa Tourist Visa shall enter the region from the country that issued the visa and move within the two other countries without applying for another visa or paying another visa fee.
d) Transit Visa $20.00
e) Administrative fee for referred visa $10.00

Persons aged 16 years and below will require a visa to enter Kenya.
Diplomatic, Official, Service and Courtesy visas will continue to be issued Gratis.

Sunday, 20 March 2016

UGANDA: A Regional Airline Is The Option For East African Community

Uganda belongs to a league of five nations that make the East African Community. According to former East African Community (EAC) Secretary General Juma Mwapachu, ‘the EAC, in its various historical forms, is the oldest regional economic organisation in the world’.

Historically, Uganda, Kenya and Tanzania have enjoyed a long history of co-operation. So much so that as early 1917, there was already a customs union between Kenya and Uganda, which the then Tanganyika joined in 1927.

This was followed by the East African High Commission (EAHC) from 1948 to 1961, the East African Common Services Organization (EACSO) from 1961 to 1967, and the 1967 to 1977 East African Community (EAC) which Burundi and Rwanda joined on 6 July 2009.

East Africa was lucky to have a visionary late Julius Nyerere of Tanzania which was the first country in East Africa to get independence, he was even prepared to delay his country’s independence in order to wait for Uganda and Kenya to also become independent so that the three could together, forge East African political union.

When he realized that the regional union was going to take long, he channeled his efforts into uniting the then Tanganyika and Zanzibar into the present union that is Tanzania which came into being in 1964. And after Uganda and Kenya got their independence in 1962 and 1963 respectively, Nyerere ensured he championed the creation of the EAC through which co-operation was to be made easy. His effort was repaid in 1967.

Having realized and understood the economic interests of the British colonialists in setting up the East African High Commission (EAHC) in 1948, he went ahead to put emphasis on strengthening common services like railways, harbors, airways, customs unions, postal services, a regional university of East Africa and other common services.

In order to strengthen the community further and to ease communication among the members of the community, he advocated for the adoption of a common language. Tanzania and Kenya adopted Kiswahili as their national language.

It is from this wise counsel that supporters of a regional airline have always got their inspiration. When we had an East African Airways (EAA), it was the most successful on the continent and one of the best in the world. It had enough passengers from the Community (EAC). Planes would collect passengers from the three countries, board them on one big plane and then flew them to Europe, Asia, and to the United States.

On realising that airline business was good business, the thieves in our different countries hatched plans to undermine the community airline under the guise of nationalism in order to create national airlines which they would use as their cash cow. They killed the EAC which had been established in 1967, and started national airlines which as predicted, could not stand the test of time.

When the EAC was reborn in 2000, the people of the region called for the revival of East African airways. But as usual, the usual suspects fronted some airline connected with South African Airways to make sure EAA is not resurrected because it would interfere with their thievery. As we talk today, Kenya Airways is near collapse having incurred a record Kenya Sh25.7 billion loss – making it the highest loss-making company in East Africa.

As for Uganda Airlines and Air Tanzania, they have really been dead for years. Until recently when we heard that former defunct Uganda Development Corporation (UDC), had been mandated to revive Uganda Airlines.

The purpose of this opinion is to first of all remind Uganda government that British Airways only recently pulled their operations out of Uganda and Tanzania because their operations were no longer commercially viable. We know there is of course business; the problem is that they could no longer compete with the other carries in our market. So how can Uganda Airlines compete?

What makes sense is going back to our regional airline now that the Community is back and even bigger with the addition of Rwanda and Burundi. Sudan would also like to join the community.

These are too many passengers, for one airline. A few years ago Kenya stood in the way of the revival of EAA. Today, it is on its knees, is begging to be bailed out by government, and it would gladly jump on to the idea of a revival of a well-managed regional airline. The Kenyan politicians are already calling for its liquidation.

The timing is therefore right for the revival of EAC now that there is clear evidence that going it alone our small individual airline have no chance of reaching their destinations. But most importantly, our region has never been more attractive to the outside world in terms of business opportunities.

What the people of East Africa want is a well managed, successful airline in which the people have a stake through shareholding. Once they do, they will patronize it, especially, government travelers.

The only thing standing in the way of the revival of a regional airline are the greedy leaders and their business cohorts. What is a Community for if the people can’t share in the services and benefits?

The co-operation between our cherished regional airline and other airlines should be mutual and beneficial to all. And finally, South African Airways through Alliance Air, and KLM, will go down as airlines which undermined our regional aviation industry. We now need to put the collective interests of our region first and all agreements with foreign airlines must reflect this interest.

Most importantly, let us live airline business to airline professionals. Uganda government and the Uganda Development Corporation need to consult those in the know because Airlines alone is not viable, cannot compete with the big airlines converging on Africa and East Africa in particular, and within the present international legal framework signed on by Uganda in ignorance.

By the way, as we discuss whether we need an airline or not, we need to be aware that there are many people in our region who will do anything and everything to ensure maintenance of the status quo. They must be resisted for the greater good.

Tuesday, 6 October 2015

Regional Airlines Talk On Way Forward

The four partner states in the Northern Corridor Integration Projects (NCIP) – Uganda, Kenya, Rwanda, and South Sudan - have finally come to appreciate that the proliferation of airlines in the region will sooner or later bring about a waste of scarce resources unless cooperation supersedes national narrow-minded ego trips, mostly by people with their own agenda.

It was welcome news, therefore, when after the last meeting of the NCIP countries in Kenya, information began to emerge that in particular South Sudan – though not a member of the East African Community but nevertheless a part of the NCIP group – and perhaps more reluctantly Uganda, came on board and agreed to promote both RwandAir and Kenya Airways to provide for the air travel needs of their respective citizens.

Bureaucrats in the national aviation regulatory offices have been tasked to create a single airspace area for the four countries, effectively preparing the way for RwandAir and Kenya Airways – Uganda and South Sudan do not have national airlines – to operate without any restrictions across the region.

RwandAir is presently operating flights from Entebbe to/from Juba and from Entebbe to/from Nairobi under fifth freedom rights. The Rwandan national airline in particular, after announcing their order for four more brand-new aircraft due to be delivered next year, including two Airbus A330s, will offer Ugandans the option to travel across the region and the continent via Kigali while expanding destinations to China, India, and Europe next year.

Similar to operations by Brussels Airlines and KLM, both of which fly from their hubs via Kigali to Entebbe, RwandAir could route their wide-body flights via Entebbe, too, subject to sufficient passenger numbers boarding and de-boarding, or else provide more feeder flights out of Entebbe to Kigali.

The same principle applies to Kenya Airways’ flights in equal terms for Juba and for Entebbe, to connect passengers from these two points of origin into their regional, African, and intercontinental network.

It is understood that the opening of the airspaces might well be restricted to the respective national carriers leaving other airlines, in particular those privately owned in Kenya out of the equation who will have to compete as designated airlines for point-to-point traffic.

The ministerial working group will submit their findings and recommendations to the next NCIP Head of State Summit which was postponed due to East Africa’s presidents attending the UN General Assembly in New York, making a postponement of the Nairobi NCIP Summit necessary.

Mr. Barry Kashambo, formerly the head of CASSOA and now Regional Director for ICAO based in Nairobi, was quoted to have said that such a move was bound to bring airfares down and increase the number of frequencies connecting the region.

The new deal could become effective, provided that in particular the notorious Kenyan regulators are kept on a tight leash, as early as the first quarter of 2016 and then provide passengers out of Entebbe and Juba with additional flights operated by Kenya Airways and RwandAir.

Left out of this development are Burundi, the worst-connected country in the East African Community and also almost shunned due to recent political events, and Tanzania, which opted to stay out of the fast-track cooperation entered into by Rwanda, Uganda, South Sudan, and Kenya.

Subsequently Tanzania’s airlines will not benefit from these additional opportunities which are now beckoning on the horizon, leaving that country to ponder what new path to embark on after a new president comes into office following the upcoming elections.

Aviation industry organizations like IATA and of course AFRAA, the African Airline Association based in Nairobi, have for long promoted the concept of closer cooperation instead of constant fragmentation to see more viable airlines emerge which have the capacity to withstand the competitive pressures of not just the European legacy airlines but in particular the emerging mega airlines from the Gulf and from Turkey.

What is need in East Africa, in fact across Africa, is a sound mix between full-service airlines and low-cost airlines. The latter has, and I give you Jambojet in Kenya and Fastjet in Tanzania as an example, brought a whole new segment of travelers to go by air instead of using buses or trains.

However, the former will equally have a place because of connectivity through their hubs rather than point-to-point traffic. If existing and well-operating airlines like Kenya Airways and RwandAir can be given full access to the market in Uganda and South Sudan, it will benefit travelers as much as the airlines.

What the countries must, however, watch out for is that limits are set on fares to avoid exploitative ticket prices, because that would kill this concept instantly.