Ebola outbreak in DR Congo has spread from the countryside into Mbandaka, causing fears that the disease will be spread further and become increasingly difficult to control.
Health Minister Oly Ilunga Kalenga confirmed a case in Mbandaka, a city of a million about 130km (80 miles) from where the first cases were confirmed.
The city is a major transportation hub with routes to the capital Kinshasa.
At least 44 people are thought to have been infected with ebola and 23 deaths are being investigated.
Ebola is a serious infectious illness that causes internal bleeding and often proves fatal.
It can spread rapidly through contact with small amounts of bodily fluid and its early flu-like symptoms are not always easy to suspect.
The World Health Organization (WHO) has called an emergency meeting of experts to talk about the risk that Ebola might spread beyond DR Congo.
World Health Organization (WHO) holds a meeting today to decide whether to declare an international public health emergency which would trigger a larger global response, like in the case of the 2014-16 Western African Ebola outbreak and the 2016 Zika virus in Latin America.
The 2014-16 West Africa outbreak, which killed 11,300 people, was particularly deadly because it spread to the capital cities of Guinea, Sierra Leone and Liberia.
Senior WHO official Peter Salama said the spread to Mbandaka meant there was the potential for an explosive increase in cases.
This is a major development in the outbreak, Salama said.
We have urban Ebola, which is a very different animal from rural Ebola. The potential for an explosive increase in cases is now there.
Mr Salama, who is the WHO's deputy director-general for emergency preparedness and response, said Mbandaka's location on the Congo river, widely used for transportation, raised the chaances of Ebola spreading to surrounding countries.
Surrounding countries such as Congo-Brazzaville and the Central African Republic as well as downstream to Kinshasa, a city of 10 million people.
This puts a whole different lens on this outbreak and gives us increased urgency to move very quickly into Mbandaka to stop this new first sign of transmission, he said.
So far only three of the 44 cases have been confirmed as Ebola and involve people who are still alive, the WHO says.
There are a further 20 probable cases and 21 suspected cases.
The cases were recorded in three health zones of Congo's Equateur province.
Isolation and rudimentary Ebola case management facilities had been set up in Mbandaka to cope with cases, Mr Salama said.
The disease may have been brought there, he said, by two or three people who had attended the funeral of an Ebola victim in Bikoro to the south of Mbandaka before travelling to the city.
On Wednesday more than 4,000 doses of an experimental vaccine sent by the WHO arrived in Kinshasa with another batch expected soon.
These would be given as a priority to people in Mbandaka who had been in contact with those suspected of carrying the Ebola virus before people in any other affected area, in order to stop Ebola spreading in the urban region and beyond, Mr Salama said.
The vaccine from pharmaceutical firm Merck is unlicensed but was effective in limited trials during the West Africa Ebola Outbreak.
It needs to be stored at a temperature of between -60 and -80 C. Electricity supplies in Congo are unreliable.
Health workers had identified 430 people who may have had contact with the disease and were working to trace more than 4,000 contacts of Ebola patients, who had spread across north-west DR Congo, the WHO said.
Many of these people were in areas only reachable by motorbike, Mr Salama said.
Mbandaka is a poor city on the banks of the River Congo.
Those of its residents who can afford to pay for electricity only get it for three to four hours a day, otherwise people use generators or solar panels.
The city has two hospitals, which have received money for renovations.
But even they do not have a regular electricity supply and have to rely on generators.
For water, Mbandaka's residents use wells or the river.
Many people also use the river as a toilet, meaning there is a high risk of diseases, not just Ebola, spreading.
Passenger boats used to operate along the river to Kinshasa but these are no longer working.
However, traders still use wooden canoes to reach the capital to buy and sell their goods, and this is how it is feared Ebola could spread.
The WHO said it was not recommending any trade or travel restrictions either within DR Congo, for example between Mbandaka and Kinshasa, or internationally.
But Mr Salama said that 13 countries in the region were boosting border screening measures and said DR Congo itself was increasing exit screening measures.
The good news is that the DR Congo population is very used to Ebola outbreaks, Salama said.
They know to protect themselves by avoiding mass gatherings and mass funerals.
They know as well that traditional healers can amplify the outbreak.
Observers described the international response so far as remarkable and very rapid.
The logistic issues will also be considerable on the ground to identify who should be vaccinated and to get out in this vast and very difficult area and provide vaccination in an appropriate way.
There have been three outbreaks in DR Congo since the 2014-16 epidemic.
Ebola is thought to be spread over long distances by fruit bats and is often transmitted to humans via contaminated bushmeat.
It can also be introduced into the human population through close contact with the blood, organs or other bodily fluids of infected animals.
These can include chimpanzees, gorillas, monkeys, antelope and porcupines.
The disease is endemic to the area and it is not possible to eradicate all the animals who might be a host for Ebola.
As long as humans come in contact with them, there is always a possibility that Ebola could breakup in any place.
Health officials have expressed concern about containment as the virus reaches a city of 1 million people. At the same time, WHO began shipping thousands of trial vaccines to Kinshasa.
The Democratic Republic of Congo warned late on Wednesday that the nation's Ebola outbreak had entered a new phase after a case was discovered in the northwestern city of Mbandaka.
It was the first registered urban case of the deadly virus, as the city has a population of some 1 million people.
We are entering a new phase of the Ebola outbreak that is now affecting three health zones, including an urban health zone, Health Minister Oly Ilunga Kalenga said.
Kalenga added that the authorities were tracing all air, river, and road routes in and out of the city in order to trace the source of the virus.
At least 23 people have died in Congo's latest outbreak, which had originally been detected in only rural areas where it would have given health officials a better chance of containing the spread of Ebola.
On Wednesday, the World Health Organization (WHO) announced that it was intensifying its vaccination campaign in Congo.
A first batch of 4,000 inoculations has arrived in the capital Kinshasa, with another 4,000 to follow soon after.
The experimental vaccines were developed two years ago following the deaths of 11,300 people in Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone in a 2014-2016 outbreak that was the deadliest in the virus' history.
Ebola virus disease spreads between humans and other infected animals via bodily fluids and can cause severe fevers, vomiting, and internal bleeding.
It was named for the Ebola River in Congo, where it was first identified in 1976.
WHO officials have described the affected area as one of the most difficult terrains on earth, making it difficult to access.
World Health Organisation is hoping to avert an epidemic like the West Africa outbreak in 2014.
The World Health Organization (WHO) on Friday said 10 countries, including the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and its neighbors, have been put on high alert after local authorities declared an Ebola outbreak earlier this week.
We are very concerned, and we are planning for all scenarios, including the worst-case scenario, said WHO emergency response chief Peter Salama in Geneva.
Salama said that WHO officials are most worried about the spread of Ebola in Congo-Brazzaville and the Central African Republic, since they are both connected to the outbreak area through river systems.
He noted that the latest outbreak has occurred in a remote area near Bikoro.
But if the virus spreads to Mbandaka, the capital of DRC's Equateur province home to more than one million inhabitants, it could have devastating consequences, he added.
This is a highly complex, sophisticated operation in one of the most difficult terrains on earth, Salama said. "
If we see a town of that size infected with Ebola, then we are going to have a major urban outbreak.
A Nurse was the first to die in Congo's latest Ebola outbreak. The first death of a new Ebola outbreak was confirmed in the Democratic Republic of Congo When the nurse died.
The World Health Organization said it was preparing for the worst case scenario.
Officials declared the outbreak in the country's northwest on Tuesday after lab tests confirmed the deadly virus in two cases from the town of Bikoro in the Equateur province.
The nurse died overnight at a hospital in nearby Ikoko Impenge, where four new suspected cases of Ebola have been reported, Health Minister Oly Ilunga said at a news conference.
Seven people with a hemorrhagic fever, including two confirmed cases of Ebola, lay in hospital late Thursday, he added.
The patients could have links to a police officer in Bikoro who died after exhibiting symptoms of hemorrhagic fever in December, National Institute of Biological and Bacterial Research director Jean Jacques Muyembe said.
The officer's mother and 10 others then showed similar symptoms. Muyembe said officials would likely contain the outbreak.
Seventeen people have died from hemorrhagic fever in recent weeks, Ilunga said, and doctors are treating three more nurses for the symptoms.
Officials must test nine patients for Ebola, just one virus responsible for such symptoms. Doctors have traveled to Bikoro to trace contacts, identify the epicenter and all affected villages, and provide resources.
The World Health Organization said on Friday it was preparing for the worst case scenario in the latest Ebola outbreak, including for the disease spreading to a major town.
WHO Deputy Director-General of Emergency Preparedness and Response Peter Salama told a regular UN briefing in Geneva that the health agency had alerted the nine neighboring countries but currently regarded the risk of regional spread as moderate.
Separately, WHO Director-General Tedros Ghebreyesus tweeted that he and Congo's health minister had agreed that Ebola vaccines will be shipped as quickly as possible.
Counting the current one, Congo has experienced nine outbreaks since researchers identified Ebola there in 1976. The country approved the use of an experimental vaccine during a flare-up almost exactly a year ago.
Without preventive measures, the virus can also spread quickly via bodily fluids from person to person and even to animals such as bats and monkeys.
Ebola, which has no specific treatment, can prove fatal in up to 90 percent of cases.
None of the Ebola outbreaks in Congo have connections to the epidemic that began in 2013 and had left more than 11,000 people dead.
Almost all of them in Guinea, Liberia and Sierra Leone before it was declared over in 2016.
However, an outbreak did leave 49 people dead in the Central African country that year.
On Thursday, Nigeria's immigration service announced that it had increased screening tests at airports and other entry points as a precautionary measure.
Officials in Guinea and Gambia also said they had heightened screening measures along their borders to prevent the spread. Such efforts had helped to contain the virus during the West Africa epidemic.
Bushmeat is believed to be the origin of the current Ebola outbreak.
The first victim's family hunted bats, which carry the virus.
Could the practice of eating bushmeat, which is popular across Africa, be responsible for the current crisis?
The origin has been traced to a two-year-old child from the village of Gueckedou in south-eastern Guinea, an area where batmeat is frequently hunted and eaten.
The infant, dubbed Child Zero, died on 6 December 2013. The child's family stated they had hunted two species of bat which carry the Ebola virus.
Bushmeat or wild animal meat covers any animal that is killed for consumption including antelopes, chimpanzees, fruit bats and rats. It can even include porcupines and snakes.
In some remote areas it is a necessary source of food,in others it has become a delicacy.
In Africa's Congo Basin, people eat an estimated five million tonnes of bushmeat per year, according to the Centre of International Forestry Research.
Some of these animals can harbour deadly diseases. Bats carry a whole range of viruses and studies have shown that some species of fruit bats can harbour Ebola.
Via their droppings or fruit they have touched, bats can then in turn infect other non-human primates such as gorillas and chimpanzees.
For them, like us, this can be deadly. Bats on the other hand can escape from it unscathed. This makes them an ideal host for the virus.
Exactly how the virus spills over into humans is still not clear.
There's often an intermediate species involved, like primates such as chimpanzees, but evidence shows people can get the virus directly from bats.
But it is difficult for the virus to jump the species barrier from animals into humans, he adds. The virus first has to somehow gain access to the cells in which it can replicate by contact with infected blood.
Most people buy bushmeat from markets once it has already been cooked, so it is those hunting or preparing the raw meat that are at highest risk.
The current outbreak shows that, however difficult or rare it is, infection is clearly possible though it must be remembered that each further infection, from Child Zero to today, has been caused by contact with an infected person.
There has been talk of banning bushmeat, but that may simply drive it underground, experts have previously warned.
Hunting bushmeat is also a longstanding tradition.
It's a meat eating society, there's a feeling that if you do not have meat every day, you haven't properly eaten.
Although you can get other forms of meat, there's traditionally very little livestock production.
In Ghana, for example, currently unaffected by the outbreak, fruit bats are widely hunted.
To understand how people interact with this particular type of bushmeat, researchers surveyed nearly 600 Ghanaians about their practices relating to bats.
The study found that hunters used several different techniques to kill their prey including shooting, netting, scavenging and catapulting.
All hunters reported handling live bats, which often meant they came into contact with blood and in some instances were bitten and scratched.
These hunters are therefore the most at risk of contracting viruses present in bats, explains one of the authors, Dr Olivier Restif from the University of Cambridge.
The work also uncovered that the scale of the bat bushmeat trade in Ghana was much higher than previously thought, with more than 100,000 bats killed and sold every year.
People who eat bat bushmeat are rarely aware of any potential risk associated with consumption.
They tend to see it as healthy food. This survey was carried out before the current outbreak but the team says that understanding the perceived risks could help control future epidemics.
Fruit bats are believed to be a major carrier of the Ebola virus but they do not show symptoms.
While there is a risk, this study exemplifies that it is low. The estimate of more than 100,000 bats consumed has not resulted in a single case of Ebola in Ghana.
Researchers have also monitored populations of bats to test for Ebola and found very few animals with detectable levels of the virus.
Since the first recorded outbreak in 1976 there have been only 30 single spillover events from animals into humans, according to new research which has mapped all previous outbreaks.
But given Ebola's animal origin, it is perhaps not surprising that bushmeat has been cited as a core danger associated with the outbreak.
The Ebola outbreak is an opportunity to clamp down on a practice which both causes disease outbreaks and empties forests of wildlife.
At a minimum, governments should zealously enforce bans on the hunting and consumption of bats and apes.
Why do Congolese keep hunting and eating bushmeat despite Ebola concerns?
It's not a disease spread by eating bushmeat. As far as we know it originated in one spillover event from one bat to a child in Guinea.
Subsequent to that it's been a human-to-human disease.
People are more vulnerable to Ebola by interacting with people than by eating bats.
Negative coverage of bushmeat has deterred people from understanding the real risk of infection.
However, despite the current outbreak, the very fact that bats are carriers means there is always a risk of further infection.
For any given contact the risk is quite low but given the scale of contact it is inevitable that there will be new emergences of Ebola or potentially other diseases that the bats harbour.
The risks may be low but the consequences are severe as we are seeing at the moment.
Because the world's population is expanding, close contract with wildlife will increase, which is often the cause of all the Ebola dilema.
Many West Africans eat bushmeat, which is always sold openly in markets across the region.
More than 100,000 bats are thought to be eaten in Ghana each year.
Cooked or smoked bushmeat is not said to be harmful.
Bushmeat, wildmeat, or game meat is meat from non-domesticated mammals, reptiles, amphibians and birds hunted for food in tropical forests. Commercial harvesting and the trade of wildlife is considered a threat to biodiversity.
Bushmeat also provides a route for a number of serious tropical diseases to spread to humans from their animal hosts.
These include Ebola. Bushmeat is used for sustenance in remote areas, while in major towns and cities in bushmeat eating societies it is treated as a delicacy.
Today the term bushmeat is commonly used for meat of terrestrial wild or feral mammals, killed for sustenance or commercial purposes throughout the humid tropics of the Americas, Asia, and Africa.
In West Africa, mostly Ghana, Ivory Coast, and Nigeria, Achatina achatina, a giant African snail, is also gathered, sold, eaten, and monitored as part of the bushmeat trade.
To reflect the global nature of hunting of wild animals, Resolution 2.64 of the IUCN General Assembly in Amman in October 2000 referred to wild meat rather than bushmeat.
A more worldwide term for terrestrial wild animals is game. The term bushmeat crisis is sometimes used to describe unsustainable hunting of often endangered wild mammals in West and Central Africa and the humid tropics, depending on interpretation.
African hunting predates recorded history; by the 21st century, it had become an international issue.
The volume of the bushmeat trade in West and Central Africa was estimated at 1-5 million tonnes per year at the turn of the century.
According to the Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) in 2014, approximately 5 million tonnes were still being consumed per year in the Congo Basin.
For the people of this region, bushmeat represents a primary source of animal protein in the diet, making it a significant commercial industry.
According to a 1994 study in Gabon, annual sales were estimated at US$50 million. The study found that bushmeat accounted for more than half of meat sold in local markets, with primates representing 20% of the total bushmeat.
Logging concessions operated by companies in African forests have been closely linked to the bushmeat trade.
Because they provide roads, trucks and other access to remote forests, they are the primary means for the transportation of hunters and meat between forests and urban centres.
Some, including the Congolaise Industrielle du Bois (CIB) in the Republic of Congo, have partnered with governments and international conservation organizations to regulate the bushmeat trade within the concessions where they operate.
Numerous solutions are needed; because each country has different circumstances, traditions and laws, no one solution will work in every location.
In the case of Liberia in West Africa, bushmeat is eaten widely and is considered a delicacy.
A 2004 public opinion survey found that bushmeat ranked second behind fish among residents of the capital Monrovia as a preferred source of protein.
Of households where bushmeat was served, 80% of residents said they cooked it once in a while, while 13% cooked it once a week and 7% cooked bushmeat daily.
The survey was conducted during the last civil war, and bushmeat consumption is now believed to be far higher.
The transmission of highly variable retrovirus chains causes zoonotic diseases. Outbreaks of the Ebola virus in the Congo Basin and in Gabon in the 1990s have been associated with the butchering of apes and consumption of their meat.
Bushmeat hunters in Central Africa infected with the human T-lymphotropic virus were closely exposed to wild primates.
Results of research on wild chimpanzees in Cameroon indicate that they are naturally infected with the simian foamy virus and constitute a reservoir of HIV-1, a precursor of the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) in humans.
There are several distinct strains of HIV, indicating that this cross species transfer has occurred several times.
Researchers have shown that HIV originated from a similar virus in primates called simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV); it is likely that HIV was initially transferred to humans after having come into contact with infected bushmeat.
The Ebola virus, for which the primary host is suspected to be fruit bats, has been linked to bushmeat.
Between the first recorded outbreak in 1976 and the largest in 2014, the virus has transferred from animals to humans only 30 times, despite large numbers of bats being killed and sold each year.
Bats drop partially eaten fruits and pulp, then land mammals such as gorillas and duikers feed on these fallen fruits.
This chain of events forms a possible indirect means of transmission from the natural host to animal populations.
Although primates and other species may be intermediates, evidence suggests people primarily contract the virus from bats.
Since most people buy smoked bushmeat, hunters and people preparing the food have the highest risk of infection.
Hunters usually shoot, net, scavenge or catapult their prey, and butcher the bats without gloves, getting bites or scratches and coming in contact with their blood.
In 2014, the suspected index case for the Ebola outbreak in West Africa is a two-year-old child in Gueckedou in south-eastern Guinea, who was the child of a family that hunted two species of fruit bat, Hypsignathus monstrosus and Epomops franqueti.
Some researchers suggested the case was caused by zoonotic transmission through the child playing with an insectivorous bat from a colony of Angolan free-tailed bats near the village.
Despite health organisations warning about risks of bushmeat, surveys pre-dating the 2014 outbreak indicate that people who eat bushmeat are usually unaware of the risks and view it as healthy food.
Because of bushmeat's role as a protein source in Western Africa, it is traditionally associated with good nutrition, and efforts to outlaw the sale and consumption of bushmeat have been impossible to enforce and have met with suspicion from rural communities.
In one study in Ghana, none of the bushmeat hunters knew about Ghana's hunting laws, suggesting that bans may not be enforceable.
The UN Food and Agriculture Organization estimates that between 30 and 80 percent of protein intake in rural households in Central Africa comes from wild meat.
However, as human populations grow, the interactions between humans and wildlife will increase, making possible zoonotic transmission of diseases from animal hosts more likely.
One major Nigerian newspaper published a report about the widespread view that eating dog meat was a healthy alternative to bush meat.
Dog meat was implicated in a June 2015 Liberian outbreak of Ebola, where three villagers who had tested positive for the disease had shared a meal of dog meat.
One study conducted in Liberia during the recent Ebola crisis showed that socio-economic conditions impacted bushmeat consumption.
During the crisis, there was a decrease in bushmeat consumption and daily meal frequency. In addition, preferences for bushmeat species stayed the same.
Animals used as bushmeat may also carry other diseases such as smallpox, chicken pox, tuberculosis, measles, rubella, rabies, yellow fever and yaws.
African squirrels (Heliosciurus, Funisciurus) have been implicated as reservoirs of the monkeypox virus in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.
The bubonic plague bacteria can transfer to humans when handling or eating North American prairie dogs.
In many instances, contracting the diseases mentioned above often occurs due to the cutting of the meat, when animal blood and other fluids may touch the people cutting it, thereby infecting them.
Another path of infection is that some of the meat may not be completely cooked. This often occurs due to the type of cooking method: hanging the meat over an open fire.
Improper preparation of any infected animal may be fatal.
The consumption of bushmeat threatens a wide range of species, including species that are endangered and threatened with extinction. For example, a range of endangered species are hunted for bushmeat in Liberia.
Species hunted for food in Liberia include elephants, pygmy hippopotamus, chimpanzees, duikers, and other monkeys. Forest rangers in Liberia say that bushmeat poachers will kill any forest animal they encounter.
The great apes of Central and West Africa gorillas and chimpanzees are nearly ubiquitously sold as bushmeat throughout the region, and a study from 1995 suggests that the off take is unsustainable.
With the exception of a 1995 report from Cameroon, where gorillas were considered a target species for hunters, Central and West African hunters do not appear to target them.
Historically, poachers have favored hunting chimpanzees because they flee when one is shot.
Gorillas, however, only became easy targets when buckshot ammunition became available, allowing the hunters to more easily kill the dominant male silverback whose role it is to defend his troop.
Generally, great apes constitute a minor portion of the bushmeat trade. Although a 1996 study indicated that approximately 1.94% of animal carcasses sold and consumed in Brazzaville in the Republic of the Congo belonged to great apes.
It accounted for 2.23% of the biomass of the meat sold, which is significant for ape populations relative to their ecosystem.
Furthermore, these numbers may not have accurately represented the extent of the problem for the following reasons:
- Vendors may not have admitted the sale of great ape meat because it is illegal therefore giving wrong information.
- The carcasses are large, and may therefore have been consumed locally rather than been transported to large markets.
- Great ape hunting usually peaks when new forest areas are made accessible as they are unwary when unfamiliar with humans, but later hunting declines.
- It is nearly impossible to visually distinguish the meat source when it has been smoked.
Secondary effects, such as unintended deaths from traps, are not represented in market data.
During the time interval between a study from 1981 to 1983 and another study between 1998–2002 in Gabon, ape population density fell 56%, despite the country retaining nearly 80% of its original forest cover.
This decline was primarily associated with the transformation of the bushmeat trade from subsistence level to unregulated, commercial hunting, facilitated by transportation infrastructure intended for logging purposes.
Unsustainable hunting practices along with habitat loss makes the extinction of these endangered primates more likely.
Just stop eating or buying game meat!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Tourism Observer
Showing posts with label ebola. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ebola. Show all posts
Friday, 18 May 2018
Tuesday, 12 July 2016
App To Navigate Child Visa Laws
This is according to Andre Van Kets, co-founder of travel company, Discover Africa Group. One of its divisions is the vehicle rental agency, Drive South Africa, which has recently introduced a new mobile and web app to help travellers navigate South Africa’s new child visa regulations.
At the start of June, South Africa’s Department of Home Affairs announced new laws which require minors (under 18) travelling to and from the country to carry particular documents in addition to a valid visa and passport. However, requirements differ depending on the scenario and guardianship the child is travelling under.
For example, a child travelling with one divorced parent with full parental rights requires an unabridged birth certificate and court order granting parental responsibilities to the travelling parent. Whereas an unaccompanied child will have to travel with anywhere between six and nine documents – depending on their particular guardianship scenario – including a letter and proof of identity of the person who is to receive the child in the country travelled to.
The new regulations are similar to other travel requirements in countries such as the US and UK, with the aim to curb child trafficking and child-custody disputes. However, while Van Kets believes the new laws are necessary, he said they can be confusing and hard to navigate.
“We thought that the documentation [Home Affairs] gave us was far below adequate. It was full of jargon… It wasn’t very clear at all,” he explained.
“They have all the right intentions, and they are a great enforcement agency, but they are not great on communication.”
Van Kets said it became the role of travel companies to communicate the new requirements. “And the reason we created the app was to present that information in a much simpler format.”
The app takes a few seconds to navigate – a simple 3-step process whereby users can enter in their particular child travel scenario, and instantly get a checklist of the documents required.
In just a few weeks the app already has over 14,000 users from 129 countries, and Van Kets said the added-value free service has brought in a lot of good publicity and traffic for the company. “We wanted our name to be associated with a good story, and a solution to a problem.”
The new child visa regulations has caused some controversy with many members of the tourism industry complaining the new laws are so confusing that they might deter travellers.
For example, the Tourism Business Council of South Africa expects 100,000 tourists may be lost this year due to rigid visa requirements, translating into a loss of R1.4bn (US$113m) in spending.
However, Van Kets argued that the real effects of the laws will not be felt immediately, and warned against exaggerated figures that might be published to prove a point.
“I think there will be a small negative effect on arrivals but it is not going to be right now. People travelling now booked maybe six to 12 months ago… And what has happened is a lot of people reported downtrends over this quarter or half year cycle. But I think it’s still a hangover from a lot of bad press coming from the Ebola scare a year or so ago,” he continued.
“If we do see a downturn directly related to the new visa laws, it’s probably not going to be right now – it’s just won’t be that immediate. It takes three to six to nine months for that to take place.
“So I think it’s vital that someone moderates it carefully and reports on it accurately, rather than mis-contributing the cause of ups and downs.”
At the start of June, South Africa’s Department of Home Affairs announced new laws which require minors (under 18) travelling to and from the country to carry particular documents in addition to a valid visa and passport. However, requirements differ depending on the scenario and guardianship the child is travelling under.
For example, a child travelling with one divorced parent with full parental rights requires an unabridged birth certificate and court order granting parental responsibilities to the travelling parent. Whereas an unaccompanied child will have to travel with anywhere between six and nine documents – depending on their particular guardianship scenario – including a letter and proof of identity of the person who is to receive the child in the country travelled to.
The new regulations are similar to other travel requirements in countries such as the US and UK, with the aim to curb child trafficking and child-custody disputes. However, while Van Kets believes the new laws are necessary, he said they can be confusing and hard to navigate.
“We thought that the documentation [Home Affairs] gave us was far below adequate. It was full of jargon… It wasn’t very clear at all,” he explained.
“They have all the right intentions, and they are a great enforcement agency, but they are not great on communication.”
Van Kets said it became the role of travel companies to communicate the new requirements. “And the reason we created the app was to present that information in a much simpler format.”
The app takes a few seconds to navigate – a simple 3-step process whereby users can enter in their particular child travel scenario, and instantly get a checklist of the documents required.
In just a few weeks the app already has over 14,000 users from 129 countries, and Van Kets said the added-value free service has brought in a lot of good publicity and traffic for the company. “We wanted our name to be associated with a good story, and a solution to a problem.”
The new child visa regulations has caused some controversy with many members of the tourism industry complaining the new laws are so confusing that they might deter travellers.
For example, the Tourism Business Council of South Africa expects 100,000 tourists may be lost this year due to rigid visa requirements, translating into a loss of R1.4bn (US$113m) in spending.
However, Van Kets argued that the real effects of the laws will not be felt immediately, and warned against exaggerated figures that might be published to prove a point.
“I think there will be a small negative effect on arrivals but it is not going to be right now. People travelling now booked maybe six to 12 months ago… And what has happened is a lot of people reported downtrends over this quarter or half year cycle. But I think it’s still a hangover from a lot of bad press coming from the Ebola scare a year or so ago,” he continued.
“If we do see a downturn directly related to the new visa laws, it’s probably not going to be right now – it’s just won’t be that immediate. It takes three to six to nine months for that to take place.
“So I think it’s vital that someone moderates it carefully and reports on it accurately, rather than mis-contributing the cause of ups and downs.”
Saturday, 30 January 2016
UGANDA: Zika Virus First Discovered 70 Years Ago Zinka Forest, Uganda
The Zika forest is not well known in Uganda, and most people will be hard-pushed to tell you where it is. The word itself means overgrown in the local Luganda language.
The Zika virus, which has been linked to thousands of babies being born with underdeveloped brains in Brazil, was discovered in a forest in the of Uganda seven decades ago.
There is dense vegetation, a wide range of trees and lots of small animals. The only people you are likely to meet here are the forest-keeper and his family. They live in a small house made of corrugated iron sheets.
The virus was discovered in the forest - then a hub of scientific research in East Africa - in 1947 by accident by Ugandan, American and European scientists working on another viral disease, Yellow Fever.
While testing monkeys in the forest the scientists, whose research had been funded for a decade by the Rockefeller Foundation, came across a new microorganism, which they named Zika.
What is the Zika virus:
- Spread by the Aedes aegypti mosquito, which also carries Dengue Fever and Yellow Fever
- First discovered in Uganda in 1947 but now spreading in Latin America
- Scientists say there is growing evidence of a link to microcephaly, that leads to babies being born with small heads
- Can lead to fever and a rash but most people show no symptoms, and there is no known cure
- Only way to fight Zika is to clear stagnant water where mosquitoes breed, and protect against mosquito bites
Only two cases of the virus have been confirmed in Uganda in the past seven decades.
This is because the types of mosquitoes that would transmit the virus to humans don't often come into contact with the general population, says Dr Julius Lutwama, a leading virologist at the Uganda Virus Research Institute.
"The Aedes we have, Aedes aegypti formosus, normally does not bite humans. And then we have other mosquitoes which live in the forests and prefer to bite at dusk and dawn," Dr Lutwama adds.
This is in contrast to Latin America, where a different sub species, Aedes aegypti aegypti, is spreading the Zika virus.
Much of the Zika forest, which is along the highway between the capital Kampala and Entebbe International Airport, has been lost to development projects, as Uganda's population grows.
All around it new big houses with freshly tiled roofs are springing up. What's left of it is gazetted for scientific research.
Several kilometres up the main road is the Uganda Virus Research Institute. It's a massive campus on a hill overlooking Lake Victoria.
Security is tight here because samples of dangerous organisms like Ebola, Yellow Fever and Zika are stored there.
This is also the only place in Uganda where you can test for Zika.
But as Dr John Kayuma, one of the laboratory managers said, one of the reasons why there are few recorded cases in Uganda could be because not many people have been tested for it.
"It is possible that there could be several people, or so many people out there with the Zika virus infection, but because many people do not seek treatment in the hospitals, we could be missing out.
"And also the surveillance has probably not picked them out. There's a possibility that there are more cases out there."
In a few months the government will be starting a study to find out how widespread the Zika virus and other flaviviruses like Yellow Fever, Dengue and West Nile are amongst the population.
In the meantime, Dr Lutwama and his team say they are keeping an eye on the type of mosquitoes in the country in case any of the ones that are good at spreading the disease enter Uganda.
The Zika virus, which has been linked to thousands of babies being born with underdeveloped brains in Brazil, was discovered in a forest in the of Uganda seven decades ago.
There is dense vegetation, a wide range of trees and lots of small animals. The only people you are likely to meet here are the forest-keeper and his family. They live in a small house made of corrugated iron sheets.
The virus was discovered in the forest - then a hub of scientific research in East Africa - in 1947 by accident by Ugandan, American and European scientists working on another viral disease, Yellow Fever.
While testing monkeys in the forest the scientists, whose research had been funded for a decade by the Rockefeller Foundation, came across a new microorganism, which they named Zika.
What is the Zika virus:
- Spread by the Aedes aegypti mosquito, which also carries Dengue Fever and Yellow Fever
- First discovered in Uganda in 1947 but now spreading in Latin America
- Scientists say there is growing evidence of a link to microcephaly, that leads to babies being born with small heads
- Can lead to fever and a rash but most people show no symptoms, and there is no known cure
- Only way to fight Zika is to clear stagnant water where mosquitoes breed, and protect against mosquito bites
Only two cases of the virus have been confirmed in Uganda in the past seven decades.
This is because the types of mosquitoes that would transmit the virus to humans don't often come into contact with the general population, says Dr Julius Lutwama, a leading virologist at the Uganda Virus Research Institute.
"The Aedes we have, Aedes aegypti formosus, normally does not bite humans. And then we have other mosquitoes which live in the forests and prefer to bite at dusk and dawn," Dr Lutwama adds.
This is in contrast to Latin America, where a different sub species, Aedes aegypti aegypti, is spreading the Zika virus.
Much of the Zika forest, which is along the highway between the capital Kampala and Entebbe International Airport, has been lost to development projects, as Uganda's population grows.
All around it new big houses with freshly tiled roofs are springing up. What's left of it is gazetted for scientific research.
Several kilometres up the main road is the Uganda Virus Research Institute. It's a massive campus on a hill overlooking Lake Victoria.
Security is tight here because samples of dangerous organisms like Ebola, Yellow Fever and Zika are stored there.
This is also the only place in Uganda where you can test for Zika.
But as Dr John Kayuma, one of the laboratory managers said, one of the reasons why there are few recorded cases in Uganda could be because not many people have been tested for it.
"It is possible that there could be several people, or so many people out there with the Zika virus infection, but because many people do not seek treatment in the hospitals, we could be missing out.
"And also the surveillance has probably not picked them out. There's a possibility that there are more cases out there."
In a few months the government will be starting a study to find out how widespread the Zika virus and other flaviviruses like Yellow Fever, Dengue and West Nile are amongst the population.
In the meantime, Dr Lutwama and his team say they are keeping an eye on the type of mosquitoes in the country in case any of the ones that are good at spreading the disease enter Uganda.
Tuesday, 15 December 2015
LIBERIA: West Africa To Lose US$3.6bn Annually From 2014-17 Due To Ebola
West Africa may lose an average of at least US$3.6 billion per year between 2014 and 2017 as a result of the Ebola crisis in the region, a United Nations report has said.
According to the United Nations Development Group (UNDG) report, the downturn is due to a decrease in trade, closing of borders, flight cancellations and reduced Foreign Direct Investment and tourism activity, fuelled by the Ebola stigma.
West African nations that experienced low or zero incidence of Ebola have already been affected by the Ebola crisis because of their deep connections with the three most affected countries, said the report released in New York recently.
“The consequences of Ebola are vast,” said Abdoulaye Mar Dieye, the Director of UNDP’s Regional Bureau for Africa. “Stigma, risk aversion and shutting down of borders have caused considerable amounts of damage, affecting economies and communities in a large number of countries across the sub-region”.
The report said Ebola has also had an important impact on human development as the region’s per capita income is expected to fall by US$18.00 per year between 2015 and 2017.
“In Côte d’Ivoire, the poverty rate has risen by at least 0.5 percentage points because of Ebola, while in Senegal the proportion of people living below the national poverty line could increase by up to 1.8 percent in 2014. In addition, food insecurity in countries such as Mali, and Guinea-Bissau is expected to increase,” the report indicated.
The report calls for increased involvement of West African governments and regional institutions to stop the epidemic and help the affected countries to recover.
In addition, the report says, preventing future outbreaks must involve a combination of regional and national interventions that include strengthening health sectors, immediate creation of a regional Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, coordinated border control and setting up of early warning and disaster management systems.
The document also calls for an integrated recovery package, which includes re-opening borders, creating effective social safety nets for affected and vulnerable populations.
According to the United Nations Development Group (UNDG) report, the downturn is due to a decrease in trade, closing of borders, flight cancellations and reduced Foreign Direct Investment and tourism activity, fuelled by the Ebola stigma.
West African nations that experienced low or zero incidence of Ebola have already been affected by the Ebola crisis because of their deep connections with the three most affected countries, said the report released in New York recently.
“The consequences of Ebola are vast,” said Abdoulaye Mar Dieye, the Director of UNDP’s Regional Bureau for Africa. “Stigma, risk aversion and shutting down of borders have caused considerable amounts of damage, affecting economies and communities in a large number of countries across the sub-region”.
The report said Ebola has also had an important impact on human development as the region’s per capita income is expected to fall by US$18.00 per year between 2015 and 2017.
“In Côte d’Ivoire, the poverty rate has risen by at least 0.5 percentage points because of Ebola, while in Senegal the proportion of people living below the national poverty line could increase by up to 1.8 percent in 2014. In addition, food insecurity in countries such as Mali, and Guinea-Bissau is expected to increase,” the report indicated.
The report calls for increased involvement of West African governments and regional institutions to stop the epidemic and help the affected countries to recover.
In addition, the report says, preventing future outbreaks must involve a combination of regional and national interventions that include strengthening health sectors, immediate creation of a regional Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, coordinated border control and setting up of early warning and disaster management systems.
The document also calls for an integrated recovery package, which includes re-opening borders, creating effective social safety nets for affected and vulnerable populations.
Friday, 4 December 2015
NORTH KOREA: North Korea Woos International Tourists
Passengers prepare to board a flight at Pyongyang Airport.
North Korea is embarking on a push to attract more tourists – but will strictly enforce rules governing visitors.
Currently a few thousand tourists visit from Western countries and more from neighbouring China.
Now North Korea is stepping up its enforcement of a broad set of strict but sometimes ambiguously implemented regulations about what foreign visitors can bring with them or what they can do while in the country.
The country’s push for tourists began in 2013 and visitors can now enjoy a surprisingly broad array of options, from helicopter rides over the capital to surfing on the country’s scenic eastern coast. With winter now setting in, the North is hoping its newly opened luxury ski resort near the city of Wonsan, which was largely empty of tourists last season while Pyongyang closed its borders over Ebola fears, will be a big draw.
Even so, the pro-tourism policy, like many other business opportunities that involve dealing with and possibly making concessions to the outside world, poses an obvious conundrum for Pyongyang – the potential of economic gains that require change, versus concerns about how that might undermine regime security.
“Despite the policy of getting more tourists, they still see security, or at least perceptions of security, as a bigger concern, and tourism is pretty far down the list of priorities,” said Simon Cockerell of Beijing-based Koryo Tours, which has specialised in North Korea travel since 1993. “It’s clear that the restrictions, rules and so on often act against increasing tourist numbers.”
For those visitors who do break the rules, the risks of detention, arrest and possibly even jail sentences are real enough, especially if the offender is from the United States. The US state department recently updated and expanded its already blunt warning against North Korean travel. In a nutshell, its advice is simple – just don’t do it.
“While tourism and the flexibility of travel in the DPRK has expanded, there has been a measurable increase in security at the borders,” said Andrea Lee, chief executive of New Jersey-based Uri Tours, which has been organising tours to the North – officially the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea – for 15 years.
North Korea is embarking on a push to attract more tourists – but will strictly enforce rules governing visitors.
Currently a few thousand tourists visit from Western countries and more from neighbouring China.
Now North Korea is stepping up its enforcement of a broad set of strict but sometimes ambiguously implemented regulations about what foreign visitors can bring with them or what they can do while in the country.
The country’s push for tourists began in 2013 and visitors can now enjoy a surprisingly broad array of options, from helicopter rides over the capital to surfing on the country’s scenic eastern coast. With winter now setting in, the North is hoping its newly opened luxury ski resort near the city of Wonsan, which was largely empty of tourists last season while Pyongyang closed its borders over Ebola fears, will be a big draw.
Even so, the pro-tourism policy, like many other business opportunities that involve dealing with and possibly making concessions to the outside world, poses an obvious conundrum for Pyongyang – the potential of economic gains that require change, versus concerns about how that might undermine regime security.
“Despite the policy of getting more tourists, they still see security, or at least perceptions of security, as a bigger concern, and tourism is pretty far down the list of priorities,” said Simon Cockerell of Beijing-based Koryo Tours, which has specialised in North Korea travel since 1993. “It’s clear that the restrictions, rules and so on often act against increasing tourist numbers.”
For those visitors who do break the rules, the risks of detention, arrest and possibly even jail sentences are real enough, especially if the offender is from the United States. The US state department recently updated and expanded its already blunt warning against North Korean travel. In a nutshell, its advice is simple – just don’t do it.
“While tourism and the flexibility of travel in the DPRK has expanded, there has been a measurable increase in security at the borders,” said Andrea Lee, chief executive of New Jersey-based Uri Tours, which has been organising tours to the North – officially the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea – for 15 years.
Wednesday, 16 September 2015
SOUTH AFRICA: Tourists Not Complaining So Much
With the weaker rand – which took another tumble over the past few days – business should be looking good for Mpumalanga tourism operators. But it isn’t.
Since last year, tourism operators in a province known for its vast attractions say they have lost between 15% and 50% of their overseas clients.
Matthew Louw, a branch manager for Hylton Ross – which offers safari tours in the Kruger National Park – says tourists have been cancelling their trips because of the new visa regulations. Visas now require unabridged birth certificates for children under the age of 18, in addition to passports.
“We should be making a lot of money, but we’re battling. There have been cancellations due to the visa regulations, Ebola, xenophobia and, to some extent, the attacks in east Africa,” he says.
“The other day, I had a very happy couple from England and they spent £3 500 (R71 000) here.
“Perhaps things will improve in the busy season from September, but it doesn’t look rosy at the moment.”
The rand depreciated to an all-time low of 14 to the US dollar at the beginning of the week, as markets plunged around the world over concerns about China’s economic health. The local currency did improve slightly on Friday morning to R13.14.
Another tour operator, Tanya Ruf of Oliver’s Restaurant and Lodge in White River, agreed with Louw about the constraints brought about by the new visa regulations.
“The weaker rand won’t help and tourists prefer to go to other countries in Africa where regulations are less stringent. I would estimate we’ve had a 10% decline in our tourist numbers. There have been people we have booked who have cancelled,” Ruf said.
“The weaker rand is definitely in our interest, but tourists are losing interest in us.”
Ruf says 65% of their tourists are foreign.
Mpumalanga is a favourite for overseas tourists because of the Kruger Park, which boasts the Big Five as well as exclusive private lodges.
According to the latest Tourism Satellite Account for SA report, tourism direct GDP was R103.6bn in 2013, compared with R93.5bn in 2012.
The Tourism Business Council of SA estimates that the country will lose in the following ways: 100 000 tourists will stay away in 2015 because of the visa regulations and the R1.4bn total net loss will result in 9 300 jobs being lost.
Since last year, tourism operators in a province known for its vast attractions say they have lost between 15% and 50% of their overseas clients.
Matthew Louw, a branch manager for Hylton Ross – which offers safari tours in the Kruger National Park – says tourists have been cancelling their trips because of the new visa regulations. Visas now require unabridged birth certificates for children under the age of 18, in addition to passports.
“We should be making a lot of money, but we’re battling. There have been cancellations due to the visa regulations, Ebola, xenophobia and, to some extent, the attacks in east Africa,” he says.
“The other day, I had a very happy couple from England and they spent £3 500 (R71 000) here.
“Perhaps things will improve in the busy season from September, but it doesn’t look rosy at the moment.”
The rand depreciated to an all-time low of 14 to the US dollar at the beginning of the week, as markets plunged around the world over concerns about China’s economic health. The local currency did improve slightly on Friday morning to R13.14.
Another tour operator, Tanya Ruf of Oliver’s Restaurant and Lodge in White River, agreed with Louw about the constraints brought about by the new visa regulations.
“The weaker rand won’t help and tourists prefer to go to other countries in Africa where regulations are less stringent. I would estimate we’ve had a 10% decline in our tourist numbers. There have been people we have booked who have cancelled,” Ruf said.
“The weaker rand is definitely in our interest, but tourists are losing interest in us.”
Ruf says 65% of their tourists are foreign.
Mpumalanga is a favourite for overseas tourists because of the Kruger Park, which boasts the Big Five as well as exclusive private lodges.
According to the latest Tourism Satellite Account for SA report, tourism direct GDP was R103.6bn in 2013, compared with R93.5bn in 2012.
The Tourism Business Council of SA estimates that the country will lose in the following ways: 100 000 tourists will stay away in 2015 because of the visa regulations and the R1.4bn total net loss will result in 9 300 jobs being lost.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
