Cannabis, also known as marijuana among other names, is a psychoactive drug from the Cannabis plant intended for medical or recreational use.
The main psychoactive part of cannabis is tetrahydrocannabinol (THC); one of 483 known compounds in the plant, including at least 65 other cannabinoids.
Cannabis can be used by smoking, vaporizing, within food, or as an extract.
Cannabis is often used for its mental and physical effects, such as a high or stoned feeling, a general change in perception, euphoria or heightened mood, and an increase in appetite.
Onset of effects is within minutes when smoked, and about 30 to 60 minutes when cooked and eaten. They last for between two and six hours. Short-term side effects may include a decrease in short-term memory, dry mouth, impaired motor skills, red eyes, and feelings of paranoia or anxiety.
Long-term side effects may include addiction, decreased mental ability in those who started as teenagers, and behavioral problems in children whose mothers used cannabis during pregnancy.
Studies have found a strong relation between cannabis use and the risk of psychosis, though the cause and effect relationship is debated.
Cannabis is mostly used recreationally or as a medicinal drug, although it may also be used for religious or spiritual purposes. In 2013, between 128 and 232 million people used cannabis 2.7% to 4.9% of the global population between the ages of 15 and 65.
In 2015, 43% of Americans had ever used cannabis, which increased to 51% in 2016. About 12% have used it in the past year, and 7.3% have used it in the past month. This makes it the most commonly used illegal drug both in the world and the United States.
The earliest recorded uses date from the 3rd millennium BC. Since the early 20th century, cannabis has been subject to legal restrictions. The possession, use, and sale of cannabis is illegal in most countries of the world.
Medical cannabis refers to the physician recommended use of cannabis, which is taking place in Canada, Belgium, Australia, the Netherlands, Germany, Spain, and 23 U.S. states. Cannabis use started to become popular in the U.S. in the 1970s.
Support for legalization has increased in the United States and several U.S. states have legalized recreational or medical use.
Medical cannabis, or medical marijuana, can refer to the use of cannabis and its cannabinoids to treat disease or improve symptoms; however, there is no single agreed upon definition.
The rigorous scientific study of cannabis as a medicine has been hampered by production restrictions and other federal regulations.
There is limited evidence suggesting cannabis can be used to reduce nausea and vomiting during chemotherapy, to improve appetite in people with HIV/AIDS, and to treat chronic pain and muscle spasms.
Its use for other medical applications is insufficient for conclusions about safety or efficacy.
Short-term use increases the risk of both minor and major adverse effects. Common side effects include dizziness, feeling tired and vomiting.
Long term effects of cannabis are not clear. Concerns include memory and cognition problems, risk of addiction, schizophrenia in young people, and the risk of children taking it by accident.
Cannabis has psychoactive and physiological effects when consumed. The immediate desired effects from consuming cannabis include relaxation and euphoria the high or stoned feeling, a general alteration of conscious perception, increased awareness of sensation, increased libido and distortions in the perception of time and space.
At higher doses, effects can include altered body image, auditory and/or visual illusions, pseudohallucinations and ataxia from selective impairment of polysynaptic reflexes. In some cases, cannabis can lead to dissociative states such as depersonalization and derealization.
Some immediate undesired side effects include a decrease in short term memory, dry mouth, impaired motor skills and reddening of the eyes.
Aside from a subjective change in perception and mood, the most common short-term physical and neurological effects include increased heart rate, increased appetite and consumption of food, lowered blood pressure, impairment of short-term and working memory, psychomotor coordination, and concentration.
Some users may experience an episode of acute psychosis, which usually abates after six hours, but in rare instances, heavy users may find the symptoms continuing for many days.
A reduced quality of life is associated with heavy cannabis use, although the relationship is inconsistent and weaker than for tobacco and other substances. It is unclear, however, if the relationship is cause and effect.
Cannabis has held sacred status in several religions. It has been used in an entheogenic context, a chemical substance used in a religious, shamanic, or spiritual context in India and Nepal since the Vedic period dating back to approximately 1500 BCE, but perhaps as far back as 2000 BCE.
There are several references in Greek mythology to a powerful drug that eliminated anguish and sorrow.
Herodotus wrote about early ceremonial practices by the Scythians, thought to have occurred from the 5th to 2nd century BCE. In modern culture the spiritual use of cannabis has been spread by the disciples of the Rastafari movement who use cannabis as a sacrament and as an aid to meditation.
The earliest known reports regarding the sacred status of cannabis in India and Nepal come from the Atharva Veda estimated to have been written sometime around 2000–1400 BCE.
Cannabis is consumed in many different ways:
Smoking, which typically involves burning and inhaling vaporized cannabinoids ("smoke") from small pipes, bongs - portable versions of hookahs with a water chamber, paper-wrapped joints or tobacco-leaf-wrapped blunts, and other items.
Vaporizer, which heats any form of cannabis to 165–190 °C (329–374 °F), causing the active ingredients to evaporate into a vapor without burning the plant material, the boiling point of THC is 157 °C (315 °F) at 760 mmHg pressure.
Cannabis tea, which contains relatively small concentrations of THC because THC is an oil or lipophilic and is only slightly water-soluble with a solubility of 2.8 mg per liter.
Cannabis tea is made by first adding a saturated fat to hot water e.g. cream or any milk except skim, with a small amount of cannabis.
Edibles, where cannabis is added as an ingredient to one of a variety of foods, including butter and baked goods. In India it is commonly made into a beverage, bhang.
According to the United States Department of Health and Human Services, there were 455,000 emergency room visits associated with cannabis use in 2011. These statistics include visits in which the patient was treated for a condition induced by or related to recent cannabis use.
The drug use must be implicated in the emergency department visit, but does not need to be the direct cause of the visit. Most of the illicit drug emergency room visits involved multiple drugs. In 129,000 cases, cannabis was the only implicated drug.
Heavy, long term exposure to marijuana may have biologically-based physical, mental, behavioral and social health consequences and may be associated with diseases of the liver particularly with co-existing hepatitis C, lungs, heart, and vasculature.
It is recommended that cannabis use be stopped before and during pregnancy as it can result in negative outcomes for both the mother and baby.
However, maternal use of marijuana during pregnancy does not appear to be associated with low birth weight or early delivery after controlling for tobacco use and other confounding factors.
A 2014 review found that while cannabis use may be less harmful than alcohol use, the recommendation to substitute it for problematic drinking is premature without further study. Other side effects include cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome.
Acute effects may include anxiety and panic, impaired attention, and memory while intoxicated, an increased risk of psychotic symptoms, and possibly an increased risk of accidents if a person drives a motor vehicle while intoxicated.
Short-term cannabis intoxication can hinder the mental processes of organizing and collecting thoughts. This condition is known as temporal disintegration. Psychotic episodes are well-documented and typically resolve within minutes or hours.
There have been few reports of symptoms lasting longer. Studies have found that cannabis use during adolescence is associated with impairments in memory that persist beyond short-term intoxication.
A limited number of studies have examined the effects of cannabis smoking on the respiratory system. Chronic heavy marijuana smoking is associated with coughing, production of sputum, wheezing, and other symptoms of chronic bronchitis.
The available evidence does not support a causal relationship between cannabis use and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Short-term use of cannabis is associated with bronchodilation.
Cannabis smoke contains thousands of organic and inorganic chemical compounds. This tar is chemically similar to that found in tobacco smoke, and over fifty known carcinogens have been identified in cannabis smoke, including; nitrosamines, reactive aldehydes, and polycylic hydrocarbons, including benzapyrene.
Cannabis smoke is also inhaled more deeply than is tobacco smoke. As of 2015, there is no consensus regarding whether cannabis smoking is associated with an increased risk of cancer.
Light and moderate use of cannabis is not believed to increase risk of lung or upper airway cancer. Evidence for causing these cancers is mixed concerning heavy, long-term use. In general there are far lower risks of pulmonary complications for regular cannabis smokers when compared with those of tobacco.
A 2015 review found an association between cannabis use and the development of testicular germ cell tumors (TGCTs), particularly non-seminoma TGCTs.
A 2015 analysis of six studies found little evidence that long-term or regular cannabis smoking was associated with lung cancer risk, though it could not rule out whether an association with heavy smoking exists.
Another 2015 meta-analysis found no association between lifetime cannabis use and risk of head or neck cancer. Combustion products are not present when using a vaporizer, consuming THC in pill form, or consuming cannabis foods.
There is concern that cannabis may contribute to cardiovascular disease. As of 2018 evidence of an association is unclear.
Cannabis is believed to be an aggravating factor in rare cases of arteritis, a serious condition that in some cases leads to amputation. Because 97% of case-reports also smoked tobacco, a formal association with cannabis could not be made.
If cannabis arteritis turns out to be a distinct clinical entity, it might be the consequence of vasoconstrictor activity observed from delta-8-THC and delta-9-THC.
Other serious cardiovascular events including myocardial infarction, stroke, sudden cardiac death, and cardiomyopathy have been reported to be temporally associated with cannabis use.
Research in these events is complicated because cannabis is often used in conjunction with tobacco, and drugs such as alcohol and cocaine.
These putative effects can be taken in context of a wide range of cardiovascular phenomena regulated by the endocannabinoid system and an overall role of cannabis in causing decreased peripheral resistance and increased cardiac output, which potentially could pose a threat to those with cardiovascular disease.
There is some evidence from case reports that cannabis use may provoke fatal cardiovascular events in young people who have not been diagnosed with cardiovascular disease.
Smoking cannabis has also been shown to increase the risk of myocardial infarction by 4.8 times for the 60 minutes after consumption.
Cannabis use is associated with neuroanatomic alterations in brain regions rich in cannabinoid receptors, such as the hippocampus, prefrontal cortex, amygdala, and cerebellum. The same review found that greater dose of marijuana and earlier age at onset of use were also associated with such alterations.
It is unclear, however, whether these alterations are caused by marijuana use or were present before such use. A 2010 review found resting blood flow to be lower globally and in prefrontal areas of the brain in cannabis users, when compared to non-users.
It was also shown that giving THC or cannabis correlated with increased bloodflow in these areas, and facilitated activation of the anterior cingulate cortex and frontal cortex when participants were presented with assignments demanding use of cognitive capacity.
Both reviews noted that some of the studies that they examined had methodological limitations, for example small sample sizes or not distinguishing adequately between cannabis and alcohol consumption.
Cannabis users appear to have smaller hippocampi than nonusers; this finding is based on a series of small studies with inconsistent designs, so it is uncertain.
A 2016 meta-analysis found that regular cannabis users tended to have cue reactivity, the intensity of which ranged from moderate to very high.
There is limited evidence that chronic cannabis use can reduce levels of glutamate metabolites in the human brain.
A 2012 meta-analysis found that the effects of cannabis use on neurocognitive functions were limited to the first 25 days of abstinence and that there was no evidence that such use had long-lasting effects.
While a 2011 review found that cannabis use impaired cognitive functions on several levels, ranging from basic coordination to executive function tasks.
Epidemiological studies have found a strong correlation between cannabis use and the risk of psychosis, and found the risk is higher with strains higher in THC. However, not all researchers consider this association to reflect a cause-and-effect relationship between cannabis use and psychosis.
It is not clear whether cannabis use affects the rate of suicide. It may increase the risk of depression, but further research is needed in this area.
Effects of chronic use in young adulthood include higher levels of substance use disorders, mental health and behavior problems, as well as lower levels of educational and employment outcomes. There is little evidence that cognitive impairments persist in adult abstinent cannabis users.
Compared to non-smokers, people who smoked cannabis regularly in adolescence exhibit reduced connectivity in specific brain regions associated with memory, learning, alertness, and executive function.
A study has suggested that sustained heavy, daily, adolescent onset cannabis use over decades is associated with a decline in IQ by age 38. No effects were found in those who initiated cannabis use later, or in those who ceased use earlier in adulthood.
Cannabis usually causes no tolerance or withdrawal symptoms except in heavy users. In a survey of heavy users, 42.4% experienced withdrawal symptoms when they tried to quit marijuana, such as craving, irritability, boredom, anxiety and sleep disturbances.
About 9% of those who experiment with marijuana eventually become dependent. The rate goes up to 1 in 6 among those who begin use as adolescents, and one-quarter to one-half of those who use it daily according to a NIDA review.
A 2013 review estimates daily use is associated with a 10-20% rate of dependence. The highest risk of cannabis dependence is found in those with a history of poor academic achievement, deviant behavior in childhood and adolescence, rebelliousness, poor parental relationships, or a parental history of drug and alcohol problems. Cannabis withdrawal is less severe than withdrawal from alcohol.
Marijuana is the most common illegal drug reported in motor vehicle accidents. A 2012 meta-analysis found that cannabis use was associated with an increased risk of being involved in a motor vehicle crash.
A 2016 review also found a statistically significant increase in crash risk associated with marijuana use, but noted that this risk was of low to medium magnitude.
The increase in risk of motor vehicle crash for cannabis use is between 2 and 3 times relative to baseline, whereas that for comparable doses of alcohol is between 6 and 15 times.
THC, the principal psychoactive constituent of the cannabis plant, has low toxicity. The dose of THC needed to kill 50% of tested rodents is extremely high. Cannabis has not been reported to cause fatal overdose in humans.
The high lipid solubility of cannabinoids results in their persisting in the body for long periods of time. Even after a single administration of THC, detectable levels of THC can be found in the body for weeks or longer depending on the amount administered and the sensitivity of the assessment method.
A number of investigators have suggested that this is an important factor in marijuana's effects, perhaps because cannabinoids may accumulate in the body, particularly in the lipid membranes of neurons.
Not until the end of the 20th century was the specific mechanism of action of THC at the neuronal level studied.
Researchers have subsequently confirmed that THC exerts its most prominent effects via its actions on two types of cannabinoid receptors, the CB1 receptor and the CB2 receptor, both of which are G protein-coupled receptors.
The CB1 receptor is found primarily in the brain as well as in some peripheral tissues, and the CB2 receptor is found primarily in peripheral tissues, but is also expressed in neuroglial cells.
THC appears to alter mood and cognition through its agonist actions on the CB1 receptors, which inhibit a secondary messenger system - adenylate cyclase in a dose-dependent manner.
These actions can be blocked by the selective CB1 receptor antagonist rimonabant (SR141716), which has been shown in clinical trials to be an effective treatment for smoking cessation, weight loss, and as a means of controlling or reducing metabolic syndrome risk factors.
However, due to the dysphoric effect of CB1 receptor antagonists, this drug is often discontinued due to these side effects.
Via CB1 receptor activation, THC indirectly increases dopamine release and produces psychotropic effects Cannabidiol (CBD) also acts as an allosteric modulator of the μ- and δ-opioid receptors.
THC also potentiates the effects of the glycine receptors. It is unknown if or how these actions contribute to the effects of cannabis.
THC and its major inactive metabolite, THC-COOH, can be measured in blood, urine, hair, oral fluid or sweat using chromatographic techniques as part of a drug use testing program or a forensic investigation of a traffic or other criminal offense.
The concentrations obtained from such analyses can often be helpful in distinguishing active use from passive exposure, elapsed time since use, and extent or duration of use.
These tests cannot, however, distinguish authorized cannabis smoking for medical purposes from unauthorized recreational smoking.
Commercial cannabinoid immunoassays, often employed as the initial screening method when testing physiological specimens for marijuana presence, have different degrees of cross-reactivity with THC and its metabolites.
Urine contains predominantly THC-COOH, while hair, oral fluid and sweat contain primarily THC. Blood may contain both substances, with the relative amounts dependent on the recency and extent of usage.
The Duquenois–Levine test is commonly used as a screening test in the field, but it cannot definitively confirm the presence of cannabis, as a large range of substances have been shown to give false positives.
Despite this, it is common in the United States for prosecutors to seek plea bargains on the basis of positive D–L tests, claiming them to be conclusive, or even to seek conviction without the use of gas chromatography confirmation, which can only be done in the lab.
In 2011, researchers at John Jay College of Criminal Justice reported that dietary zinc supplements can mask the presence of THC and other drugs in urine.
However, a 2013 study conducted by researchers at the University of Utah School of Medicine refute the possibility of self-administered zinc producing false-negative urine drug tests.
CBD is a 5-HT1A receptor agonist, which may also contribute to an anxiolytic effect. This likely means the high concentrations of CBD found in Cannabis indica mitigate the anxiogenic effect of THC significantly.
The effects of sativa are well known for their cerebral high, hence its daytime use as medical cannabis, while indica is well known for its sedative effects and preferred night time use as medical cannabis.
According to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), the amount of THC present in a cannabis sample is generally used as a measure of cannabis potency. The three main forms of cannabis products are the flower, resin (hashish), and oil (hash oil).
The UNODC states that cannabis often contains 5% THC content, resin can contain up to 20% THC content, and that Cannabis oil may contain more than 60% THC content.
A 2012 review found that the THC content in marijuana had increased worldwide from 1970 to 2009. It is unclear, however, whether the increase in THC content has caused people to consume more THC or if users adjust based on the potency of the cannabis.
It is likely that the higher THC content allows people to ingest less tar. At the same time, CBD levels in seized samples have lowered, in part because of the desire to produce higher THC levels and because more illegal growers cultivate indoors using artificial lights.
This helps avoid detection but reduces the CBD production of the plant.
Australia's National Cannabis Prevention and Information Centre (NCPIC) states that the buds or flowers of the female cannabis plant contain the highest concentration of THC, followed by the leaves.
The stalks and seeds have much lower THC levels. The UN states that leaves can contain ten times less THC than the buds, and the stalks one hundred times less THC.
After revisions to cannabis scheduling in the UK, the government moved cannabis back from a class C to a class B drug. A purported reason was the appearance of high potency cannabis.
They believe skunk accounts for between 70 and 80% of samples seized by police despite the fact that skunk can sometimes be incorrectly mistaken for all types of herbal cannabis. Extracts such as hashish and hash oil typically contain more THC than high potency cannabis flowers.
Marijuana or marihuana the herbal cannabis, consists of the dried flowers and subtending leaves and stems of the female Cannabis plant. This is the most widely consumed form, containing 3% to 20% THC, with reports of up-to 33% THC.
This is the stock material from which all other preparations are derived. Although herbal cannabis and industrial hemp derive from the same species and contain the psychoactive component (THC), they are distinct strains with unique biochemical compositions and uses.
Hemp has lower concentrations of THC and higher concentrations of CBD, which decreases the psychoactive effects.
Kief is a powder, rich in trichomes, which can be sifted from the leaves and flowers of cannabis plants and either consumed in powder form or compressed to produce cakes of hashish. The word kif derives from colloquial meaning pleasure.
Hashish is a concentrated resin cake or ball produced from pressed kief, the detached trichomes and fine material that falls off cannabis flowers and leaves.
Sometimes from scraping the resin from the surface of the plants and rolling it into balls. It varies in color from black to golden brown depending upon purity and variety of cultivar it was obtained from.
It can be consumed orally or smoked, and is also vaporised, or vaped. The term rosin hash refers to a high quality solventless product obtained through heat and pressure.
Cannabinoids can be extracted from cannabis plant matter using high-proof spirits - often grain alcohol to create a tincture, often referred to as green dragon. Nabiximols is a branded product name from a tincture manufacturing pharmaceutical company.
Hash oil is a resinous matrix of cannabinoids obtained from the Cannabis plant by solvent extraction, formed into a hardened or viscous mass.
Hash oil can be the most potent of the main cannabis products because of its high level of psychoactive compound per its volume, which can vary depending on the plant's mix of essential oils and psychoactive compounds.
Butane and supercritical carbon dioxide hash oil have become popular in recent years.
There are many varieties of cannabis infusions owing to the variety of non-volatile solvents used. The plant material is mixed with the solvent and then pressed and filtered to express the oils of the plant into the solvent.
Examples of solvents used in this process are cocoa butter, dairy butter, cooking oil, glycerine, and skin moisturizers. Depending on the solvent, these may be used in cannabis foods or applied topically.
Medical marijuana refers to the use of the Cannabis plant as a physician-recommended herbal therapy as well as synthetic THC and cannabinoids.
So far, the medical use of cannabis is legal only in a limited number of territories, including Canada, Belgium, Australia, the Netherlands, Spain, and many U.S. states.
This usage generally requires a prescription, and distribution is usually done within a framework defined by local laws.
There is evidence supporting the use of cannabis or its derivatives in the treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, neuropathic pain, and multiple sclerosis. Lower levels of evidence support its use for AIDS wasting syndrome, epilepsy, rheumatoid arthritis, and glaucoma.
Cannabis is indigenous to Central and South Asia, and its use for fabric and rope dates back to the Neolithic age in China and Japan.
It is unclear when cannabis first became known for its psychoactive properties; some scholars suggest that the ancient Indian drug soma, mentioned in the Vedas, was cannabis, although this theory is disputed.
Cannabis was also known to the ancient Assyrians, who discovered its psychoactive properties through the Aryans. Using it in some religious ceremonies, they called it qunubu meaning way to produce smoke, a probable origin of the modern word cannabis.
The Aryans also introduced cannabis to the Scythians, Thracians and Dacians, whose shamans burned cannabis flowers to induce trance.
Cannabis has an ancient history of ritual use and is found in pharmacological cults around the world. Hemp seeds discovered by archaeologists at Pazyryk suggest early ceremonial practices like eating by the Scythians occurred during the 5th to 2nd century BC, confirming previous historical reports by Herodotus.
It was used by Muslims in various Sufi orders as early as the Mamluk period, for example by the Qalandars. Smoking pipes uncovered in Ethiopia and carbon-dated to around c. AD 1320 were found to have traces of cannabis.
Following an 1836–1840 travel in North Africa and the Middle East, French physician Jacques-Joseph Moreau wrote on the psychological effects of cannabis use; Moreau was a member of Paris' Club des Hashischins.
In 1842, Irish physician William Brooke O'Shaughnessy, who had studied the drug while working as a medical officer in Bengal with the East India company, brought a quantity of cannabis with him on his return to Britain, provoking renewed interest in the West.
Examples of classic literature of the period featuring cannabis include Les paradis artificiels (1860) by Charles Baudelaire and The Hasheesh Eater (1857) by Fitz Hugh Ludlow.
Cannabis was criminalized in various countries beginning in the 19th century. The British colonies of Mauritius banned cannabis in 1840 over concerns on its effect on Indian indentured workers, the same occurred in British Singapore in 1870.
In the United States, the first restrictions on sale of cannabis came in 1906 in the District of Columbia. It was outlawed in Jamaicathen a British colony in 1913, in South Africa in 1922, and in the United Kingdom and New Zealand in the 1920s.
Canada criminalized cannabis in The Opium and Narcotic Drug Act, 1923, before any reports of the use of the drug in Canada.
In 1925 a compromise was made at an international conference in The Hague about the International Opium Convention that banned exportation of Indian hemp to countries that had prohibited its use.
And requiring importing countries to issue certificates approving the importation and stating that the shipment was required exclusively for medical or scientific purposes.
It also required parties to exercise an effective control of such a nature as to prevent the illicit international traffic in Indian hemp and especially in the resin. In the United States in 1937, the Marihuana Tax Act was passed, and prohibited the production of hemp in addition to cannabis.
In 1972, the Dutch government divided drugs into more- and less-dangerous categories, with cannabis being in the lesser category. Accordingly, possession of 30 grams or less was made a misdemeanor. Cannabis has been available for recreational use in coffee shops since 1976.
Cannabis products are only sold openly in certain local Coffee Shops and possession of up to 5 grams for personal use is decriminalised, however: the police may still confiscate it, which often happens in car checks near the border.
Other types of sales and transportation are not permitted, although the general approach toward cannabis was lenient even before official decriminalisation.
In Uruguay, President Jose Mujica signed legislation to legalize recreational cannabis in December 2013, making Uruguay the first country in the modern era to legalize cannabis.
In August 2014, Uruguay legalized growing up to six plants at home, as well as the formation of growing clubs, and a state-controlled marijuana dispensary regime.
Following Canada's 2015 election of Justin Trudeau and formation of a Liberal government, in 2017 the House of Commons passed a bill to legalize cannabis on 1 July 2018.
The United Nations' World Drug Report stated that cannabis was the world's most widely produced, trafficked, and consumed drug in the world in 2010, and estimated between 128 million and 238 million users globally in 2015.
Since the beginning of the 20th century, most countries have enacted laws against the cultivation, possession or transfer of cannabis.
These laws have impacted adversely on the cannabis plant's cultivation for non-recreational purposes, but there are many regions where, under certain circumstances, handling of cannabis is legal or licensed.
Many jurisdictions have lessened the penalties for possession of small quantities of cannabis so that it is punished by confiscation and sometimes a fine, rather than imprisonment, focusing more on those who traffic the drug on the black market.
In some areas where cannabis use had been historically tolerated, new restrictions were instituted, such as the closing of cannabis coffee shops near the borders of the Netherlands, and closing of coffee shops near secondary schools in the Netherlands.
In Copenhagen, Denmark in 2014, mayor Frank Jensen discussed possibilities for the city to legalize cannabis production and commerce.
Some jurisdictions use free voluntary treatment programs and/or mandatory treatment programs for frequent known users.
Simple possession can carry long prison terms in some countries, particularly in East Asia, where the sale of cannabis may lead to a sentence of life in prison or even execution.
Political parties, non-profit organizations, and causes based on the legalization of medical cannabis and/or legalizing the plant entirely with some restrictions have emerged in such countries as China and Thailand.
In December 2012, the U.S. state of Washington became the first state to officially legalize cannabis in a state law (Washington Initiative 502) but still illegal by federal law, with the state of Colorado following close behind (Colorado Amendment 64).
On January 1, 2013, the first marijuana club for private marijuana smoking - no buying or selling, however was allowed for the first time in Colorado.
The California Supreme Court decided in May 2013 that local governments can ban medical marijuana dispensaries despite a state law in California that permits the use of cannabis for medical purposes. At least 180 cities across California have enacted bans in recent years.
In December 2013, Uruguay became the first country to legalize growing, sale and use of cannabis. After a long delay in implementing the retail component of the law, in 2017 sixteen pharmacies were authorized to sell cannabis commercially.
In November 2015, Uttarakhand became the first state of India to legalize the cultivation of hemp for industrial purposes.
On October 17, 2015, Australian health minister Sussan Ley presented a new law that will allow the cultivation of cannabis for scientific research and medical trials on patients.
In December 2015, it was reported that the Canadian government had committed to legalizing cannabis, but at that time no timeline for the legalization was set out.
As the drug has increasingly come to be seen as a health issue instead of criminal behavior, marijuana has also been legalized or decriminalized in: Czech Republic, Colombia, Ecuador, Mexico, Portugal, and Canada.
In 2013, between 128 and 232 million people used cannabis, 2.7% to 4.9% of the global population between the ages of 15 and 65. Cannabis is by far the most widely used illicit substance.
Between 1973 and 1978, eleven states decriminalized marijuana. In 2001 Nevada reduced marijuana possession to a misdemeanor and since 2012, several other states have decriminalized and even legalized marijuana.
In 2015, almost half of the people in the United States had tried marijuana, 12% had used it in the past year, and 7.3% had used it in the past month.
In 2014, daily marijuana use amongst US college students had reached its highest level since records began in 1980, rising from 3.5% in 2007 to 5.9% in 2014 and had surpassed daily cigarette use.
In the US, men are over twice as likely to use marijuana as women and 18-29 year-olds are six times more likely to use as over 65-year-olds. In 2015, a record 44% of the US population has tried marijuana in their lifetime, an increase from 38% in 2013 and 33% in 1985.
Marijuana use in the United States is three times above the global average, but in line with other Western democracies.
44% of American 12th graders have tried the drug at least once, and the typical age of first-use is 16, similar to the typical age of first-use for alcohol but lower than the first-use age for other illicit drugs.
It is often claimed by growers and breeders of herbal cannabis that advances in breeding and cultivation techniques have increased the potency of cannabis since the late 1960s and early '70s when THC was first discovered and understood.
However, potent seedless cannabis such as Thai sticks were already available at that time. Sinsemilla is the dried, seedless inflorescences of female cannabis plants.
Because THC production drops off once pollination occurs, the male plants which produce little THC themselves are eliminated before they shed pollen to prevent pollination.
Advanced cultivation techniques such as hydroponics, cloning, high-intensity artificial lighting, and the sea of green method are frequently employed as a response to prohibition enforcement efforts that make outdoor cultivation more risky.
It is often cited that the average levels of THC in cannabis sold in the United States rose dramatically between the 1970s and 2000, but such statements are likely skewed because undue weight is given to much more expensive and potent, but less prevalent samples.
Skunk refers to several named strains of potent cannabis, grown through selective breeding and sometimes hydroponics. It is a cross-breed of Cannabis sativa and C. indica, although other strains of this mix exist in abundance.
Skunk cannabis potency ranges usually from 6% to 15% and rarely as high as 20%. The average THC level in coffee shops in the Netherlands is about 18–19%.
The price or street value of cannabis varies widely depending on geographic area and potency.
In the United States, cannabis is overall the number four value crop, and is number one or two in many states including California, New York and Florida, averaging $3,000 per pound ($6,600/kg).
Some believe it generates an estimated $36 billion market. Some have argued that this estimate is methodologically flawed, and makes unrealistic assumptions about the level of marijuana consumption.
Other estimates claiming to correct for this flaw claim that the market is between $2.1-$4.3 billion. The United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime claims in its 2008 World Drug Report that typical U.S. retail prices are $10–15 per gram (approximately $280–420 per ounce).
Street prices in North America are known to range from about $40–$400 per ounce ($1.4–$14/g), depending on quality.
The European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction reports that typical retail prices in Europe for cannabis varies from €2 to €20 per gram, with a majority of European countries reporting prices in the range €4–10.
The Gateway Hypothesis states that cannabis use increases the probability of trying harder drugs. The hypothesis has been hotly debated as it is regarded by some as the primary rationale for the United States prohibition on cannabis use.
A Pew Research Center poll found that political opposition to marijuana use was significantly associated with concerns about health effects and whether legalization would increase marijuana use by children.
Some studies state that while there is no proof for the gateway hypothesis, young cannabis users should still be considered as a risk group for intervention programs.
Other findings indicate that hard drug users are likely to be poly-drug users, and that interventions must address the use of multiple drugs instead of a single hard drug. Almost two-thirds of the poly drug users in the 2009/10 Scottish Crime and Justice Survey used cannabis.
The gateway effect may appear due to social factors involved in using any illegal drug. Because of the illegal status of cannabis, its consumers are likely to find themselves in situations allowing them to acquaint with individuals using or selling other illegal drugs.
Utilizing this argument some studies have shown that alcohol and tobacco may additionally be regarded as gateway drugs; however, a more parsimonious explanation could be that cannabis is simply more readily available and at an earlier age than illegal hard drugs.
In turn alcohol and tobacco are easier to obtain at an earlier point than is cannabis though the reverse may be true in some areas, thus leading to the gateway sequence in those individuals since they are most likely to experiment with any drug offered.
An alternative to the gateway hypothesis is the common liability to addiction (CLA) theory. It states that some individuals are, for various reasons, willing to try multiple recreational substances.
The gateway drugs are merely those that are usually available at an earlier age than the harder drugs. Researchers have noted in an extensive review that it is dangerous to present the sequence of events described in gateway theory in causative terms as this hinders both research and intervention.
Cannabis research is challenging since the plant is illegal in most countries. Research-grade samples of the drug are difficult to obtain for research purposes, unless granted under authority of national governments.
There are also other difficulties in researching the effects of cannabis. Many people who smoke cannabis also smoke tobacco. This causes confounding factors, where questions arise as to whether the tobacco, the cannabis, or both that have caused a cancer.
Another difficulty researchers have is in recruiting people who smoke cannabis into studies. Because cannabis is an illegal drug in many countries, people may be reluctant to take part in research, and if they do agree to take part, they may not say how much cannabis they actually smoke.
A 2015 review found that the use of high CBD-to-THC strains of cannabis showed significantly fewer positive symptoms such as delusions and hallucinations, better cognitive function and both lower risk for developing psychosis, as well as a later age of onset of the illness, compared to cannabis with low CBD-to-THC ratios.
A 2014 Cochrane review found that research was insufficient to determine the safety and efficacy to using cannabis to treat schizophrenia or psychosis.
Tourism Observer
Showing posts with label Cannabis. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Cannabis. Show all posts
Thursday, 21 June 2018
Tuesday, 1 March 2016
USA: High Tourists Clogging Up A&E In Countries That 'freed the weed'
These two executives for Native Roots, Denver are making a killing
AN UNEXPECTED side effect is plaguing western countries that have "freed the weed".
Doctors are at their wit's end now hordes of nauseous tourists are turning up in emergency rooms — all because they can't handle their cannabis.
States that have legalised the herbal remedy are reporting a huge increase in foreigners who want to indulge in the pot on offer at local dispensaries.
And emergency room visits by "high" tourists have soared.
In the year recreational marijuana became legal in Colorado, US, 16% of patients admitted were foreigners suffering from weed-related ailments — an increase on 1% the previous year.
The figures were published in a New England Journal of Medicine study this week.
Deloise Vaden, left, and Elyse Gordon make baked weed products
Despite the longer A&E queue, the law change has had various benefits.
Colarado Tourism Office said that access to weed has influenced visitors' decisions to travel there for a holiday.
And the legalisation has spawned a new tourism industry offering green-themed experiences.
Trips including a four-hour Dispensary and Grow tour where guests are packed onto a tinted-windowed party bus and given a marijuana user’s guide all to the tune of John Denver’s Rocky Mountain High have proven particularly popular.
This week Australia followed suit and is one of the latest western countries to give the green light to medical marijuana, following Canada and more than half the states in the US.
Medical professionals and lawyers have warned the UK is falling behind other western countries on drug laws.
AN UNEXPECTED side effect is plaguing western countries that have "freed the weed".
Doctors are at their wit's end now hordes of nauseous tourists are turning up in emergency rooms — all because they can't handle their cannabis.
States that have legalised the herbal remedy are reporting a huge increase in foreigners who want to indulge in the pot on offer at local dispensaries.
And emergency room visits by "high" tourists have soared.
In the year recreational marijuana became legal in Colorado, US, 16% of patients admitted were foreigners suffering from weed-related ailments — an increase on 1% the previous year.
The figures were published in a New England Journal of Medicine study this week.
Deloise Vaden, left, and Elyse Gordon make baked weed products
Despite the longer A&E queue, the law change has had various benefits.
Colarado Tourism Office said that access to weed has influenced visitors' decisions to travel there for a holiday.
And the legalisation has spawned a new tourism industry offering green-themed experiences.
Trips including a four-hour Dispensary and Grow tour where guests are packed onto a tinted-windowed party bus and given a marijuana user’s guide all to the tune of John Denver’s Rocky Mountain High have proven particularly popular.
This week Australia followed suit and is one of the latest western countries to give the green light to medical marijuana, following Canada and more than half the states in the US.
Medical professionals and lawyers have warned the UK is falling behind other western countries on drug laws.
Friday, 11 December 2015
USA: Is Marijuana Influencing Tourism In Colorado?
A recent Colorado Tourism Office survey of summer travelers shows 48 percent were influenced by legal recreational pot
Marijuana businesses have long proclaimed that cannabis is drawing visitors to Colorado. Now they have proof.
A study commissioned by the Colorado Tourism Office and presented to the office's board of directors on Wednesday shows legal weed as a growing motivator for trips to Colorado — conflicting with the mantra of tourism officials statewide that savvy marketing alone is responsible for record visitation and spending in the past two years.
While the state's "Come to Life" ad campaign is certainly successful, surveys in October and November of potential summertime visitors who were exposed to the state's tourism ads revealed that the marijuana laws influenced vacation decisions nearly 49 percent of the time.
"I think it is rearing its head as a significant travel and tourism amenity for visitors coming to Colorado," said Al White, who retired as boss of the Colorado Tourism Office in August and now serves on the board of a cannabis tourism company.
But the survey's director said the questions may not have captured the opinion of people who opted out of Colorado travel because of legal pot. And only 8 percent of the Colorado tourists who responded to the survey said they visited a marijuana dispensary.
"I think definitely the laws are having an influence when people are considering Colorado. We can see that it's still not a large percentage in terms of what people are doing, but it's become more of a motivator for those who want to do it," said Denise Miller, director of tourism surveys for Strategic Marketing and Research Insights, or SMARI, as she presented the midyear update to the tourism office's board of directors. "It's certainly having some influence — both, I think, positive and negative on that decision process."
SMARI conducted 33-question surveys of 3,254 tourists from target markets in Chicago, Dallas, Houston, Indianapolis, Milwaukee, San Diego, St. Louis and other cities. About 10 percent of those surveyed had vacationed in Colorado between April and September.
The state tourism office has spent more than $5.3 million to run its "Come to Life" television, print, billboard and digital ads in these cities as well as nationally this summer. The campaign hit 11.1 million households, up from 9.4 million in 2014.
SMARI estimated the 2015 summer ad campaign spurred 2.1 million leisure trips, generating an economic impact of $2.6 billion. That means for every dollar the state invested in its tourism promotion effort, it generated a $490 return, up from $344 in 2014.
So the ad campaign is working very well. But those ads never mention marijuana. Yet, 22 percent of survey respondents said marijuana was "extremely influential" in their decision to visit Colorado. Twenty percent said it was "very much influential" and nearly 7 percent said it was "somewhat influential."
But only 8 percent of tourists said they visited a marijuana dispensary during their trip to Colorado — the same percentage who said they visited a pot shop last year, according to SMARI's survey.
Of the 8 percent who went pot shopping, 85 percent this year said marijuana was a primary motivator of their visit to Colorado, up from 29 percent last year.
Retail sales of recreational marijuana became legal Jan. 1, 2014.
Last year the first year SMARI asked marijuana questions to potential Colorado vacationers — 65 percent of Colorado visitors did not consider legal weed in their vacation decision, with the remainder split between respondents saying they were "more likely to visit" and "less likely to visit" because of marijuana.
This year, those results moved slightly, with 20 percent of potential Colorado vacationers saying the state's marijuana laws made them more likely to book a vacation and 15 percent saying they were less likely. The remainder said it wasn't an issue.
The question in SMARI's summer survey asked: "How much did the legalization of marijuana usage influence your decision to visit Colorado?"
SMARI's Miller said her team needs to follow up with better questions.
New tourism office chief Cathy Ritter, who started her job last week, said last month that legal cannabis is "a great topic for discussion and a great topic for more research."
Ritter did not speak during the board discussion of marijuana Wednesday. But in November, when she was named to the post, she said it "seems to be that the tourism program today is essentially silent on the whole issue."
In Telluride, where 80 percent of voters approved recreational weed in 2012, the new tourism tagline is "The Most Colorado Place on Earth." It's one of the few Colorado towns that doesn't ignore pot as a guest amenity. One local dispensary delivers goods through its own app.
"We dabble, but we don't want to fly the freak flag. I don't want to put it under the rug, but I don't want it to be the most important thing we do," said Michael Martelon, the president of the Telluride Tourism Board, noting that taxes from weed in the town rarely top 3 percent of the town's overall sales tax revenue.
When White announced 2014's record visitation and spending in June this year, he was quick to not credit cannabis.
"This is because we are doing a good job in Colorado. Is marijuana beneficial?" said White in June of this year. "Marginally, yes, I think it may be a decision influencer for some people coming."
Marijuana is no longer in the margins of Colorado tourism. It's taking a starring role.
"It's extremely influential," White said this week.
Danny Schaefer let out a hoot when he heard the recent survey numbers. His My420Tours hosts 120 to 200 visitors a week and just inked a deal with a national hotel chain to host his clients, each getting a cannabis vaporizer to use in the room when they check-in. (He won't name the chain yet. White is a member of his board.)
"This is absolutely validating," said Schaefer, who has urged tourism leaders to celebrate marijuana before other states where the recreational sales are legal, including Oregon and Washington, steal the tourism thunder. He's making plans to expand to Portland, Ore., where, he said, local tourism officials are welcoming him.
"The state of Colorado has had an amazing opportunity to embrace this industry," he said. "It a complete advantage for Colorado to become the Napa Valley and Sonoma County of cannabis."
Selling, possessing and using marijuana is illegal under federal law. State officials say they have never promoted marijuana because Amendment 64 regulations prevent pot businesses from advertising outside Colorado.
Schaefer says that's fine. But visitors need information. Why doesn't the state help on that front, he wondered. Education doesn't have to be advertising, he said.
"Shatter, wax, hash, dabs and transdermals. Our visitors, they have no idea what the modern industry has in the store for them and they are really lacking that education," Schaefer said. "Consumption education is absolutely necessary. We have so many people saying we were looking for information on marijuana on Colorado.com or at a Visit Denver welcome center and they couldn't find anything even mentioning marijuana. But they found hundreds of fliers and pamphlets on craft beer and liquor."
Marijuana businesses have long proclaimed that cannabis is drawing visitors to Colorado. Now they have proof.
A study commissioned by the Colorado Tourism Office and presented to the office's board of directors on Wednesday shows legal weed as a growing motivator for trips to Colorado — conflicting with the mantra of tourism officials statewide that savvy marketing alone is responsible for record visitation and spending in the past two years.
While the state's "Come to Life" ad campaign is certainly successful, surveys in October and November of potential summertime visitors who were exposed to the state's tourism ads revealed that the marijuana laws influenced vacation decisions nearly 49 percent of the time.
"I think it is rearing its head as a significant travel and tourism amenity for visitors coming to Colorado," said Al White, who retired as boss of the Colorado Tourism Office in August and now serves on the board of a cannabis tourism company.
But the survey's director said the questions may not have captured the opinion of people who opted out of Colorado travel because of legal pot. And only 8 percent of the Colorado tourists who responded to the survey said they visited a marijuana dispensary.
"I think definitely the laws are having an influence when people are considering Colorado. We can see that it's still not a large percentage in terms of what people are doing, but it's become more of a motivator for those who want to do it," said Denise Miller, director of tourism surveys for Strategic Marketing and Research Insights, or SMARI, as she presented the midyear update to the tourism office's board of directors. "It's certainly having some influence — both, I think, positive and negative on that decision process."
SMARI conducted 33-question surveys of 3,254 tourists from target markets in Chicago, Dallas, Houston, Indianapolis, Milwaukee, San Diego, St. Louis and other cities. About 10 percent of those surveyed had vacationed in Colorado between April and September.
The state tourism office has spent more than $5.3 million to run its "Come to Life" television, print, billboard and digital ads in these cities as well as nationally this summer. The campaign hit 11.1 million households, up from 9.4 million in 2014.
SMARI estimated the 2015 summer ad campaign spurred 2.1 million leisure trips, generating an economic impact of $2.6 billion. That means for every dollar the state invested in its tourism promotion effort, it generated a $490 return, up from $344 in 2014.
So the ad campaign is working very well. But those ads never mention marijuana. Yet, 22 percent of survey respondents said marijuana was "extremely influential" in their decision to visit Colorado. Twenty percent said it was "very much influential" and nearly 7 percent said it was "somewhat influential."
But only 8 percent of tourists said they visited a marijuana dispensary during their trip to Colorado — the same percentage who said they visited a pot shop last year, according to SMARI's survey.
Of the 8 percent who went pot shopping, 85 percent this year said marijuana was a primary motivator of their visit to Colorado, up from 29 percent last year.
Retail sales of recreational marijuana became legal Jan. 1, 2014.
Last year the first year SMARI asked marijuana questions to potential Colorado vacationers — 65 percent of Colorado visitors did not consider legal weed in their vacation decision, with the remainder split between respondents saying they were "more likely to visit" and "less likely to visit" because of marijuana.
This year, those results moved slightly, with 20 percent of potential Colorado vacationers saying the state's marijuana laws made them more likely to book a vacation and 15 percent saying they were less likely. The remainder said it wasn't an issue.
The question in SMARI's summer survey asked: "How much did the legalization of marijuana usage influence your decision to visit Colorado?"
SMARI's Miller said her team needs to follow up with better questions.
New tourism office chief Cathy Ritter, who started her job last week, said last month that legal cannabis is "a great topic for discussion and a great topic for more research."
Ritter did not speak during the board discussion of marijuana Wednesday. But in November, when she was named to the post, she said it "seems to be that the tourism program today is essentially silent on the whole issue."
In Telluride, where 80 percent of voters approved recreational weed in 2012, the new tourism tagline is "The Most Colorado Place on Earth." It's one of the few Colorado towns that doesn't ignore pot as a guest amenity. One local dispensary delivers goods through its own app.
"We dabble, but we don't want to fly the freak flag. I don't want to put it under the rug, but I don't want it to be the most important thing we do," said Michael Martelon, the president of the Telluride Tourism Board, noting that taxes from weed in the town rarely top 3 percent of the town's overall sales tax revenue.
When White announced 2014's record visitation and spending in June this year, he was quick to not credit cannabis.
"This is because we are doing a good job in Colorado. Is marijuana beneficial?" said White in June of this year. "Marginally, yes, I think it may be a decision influencer for some people coming."
Marijuana is no longer in the margins of Colorado tourism. It's taking a starring role.
"It's extremely influential," White said this week.
Danny Schaefer let out a hoot when he heard the recent survey numbers. His My420Tours hosts 120 to 200 visitors a week and just inked a deal with a national hotel chain to host his clients, each getting a cannabis vaporizer to use in the room when they check-in. (He won't name the chain yet. White is a member of his board.)
"This is absolutely validating," said Schaefer, who has urged tourism leaders to celebrate marijuana before other states where the recreational sales are legal, including Oregon and Washington, steal the tourism thunder. He's making plans to expand to Portland, Ore., where, he said, local tourism officials are welcoming him.
"The state of Colorado has had an amazing opportunity to embrace this industry," he said. "It a complete advantage for Colorado to become the Napa Valley and Sonoma County of cannabis."
Selling, possessing and using marijuana is illegal under federal law. State officials say they have never promoted marijuana because Amendment 64 regulations prevent pot businesses from advertising outside Colorado.
Schaefer says that's fine. But visitors need information. Why doesn't the state help on that front, he wondered. Education doesn't have to be advertising, he said.
"Shatter, wax, hash, dabs and transdermals. Our visitors, they have no idea what the modern industry has in the store for them and they are really lacking that education," Schaefer said. "Consumption education is absolutely necessary. We have so many people saying we were looking for information on marijuana on Colorado.com or at a Visit Denver welcome center and they couldn't find anything even mentioning marijuana. But they found hundreds of fliers and pamphlets on craft beer and liquor."
Thursday, 19 November 2015
USA; Tourists Will Not See Cannabis In San Francisco
For a certain generation, Joe DiMaggio was San Francisco's greatest citizen. The son of a Sicilian fisherman, whose people gifted the city cioppino and christened Fisherman's Wharf, DiMaggio never forgot his roots. Even after the Hall of Fame baseball career with the New York Yankees and the marriage to Marilyn Monroe — whose legend eclipsed his own during his lifetime — he spent much of his retirement at the family's waterfront restaurant on Jefferson Street. Located next to the docks where, when Joe was a boy, the clan would gather on Sundays to help repair his father's fishing nets, the restaurant's two story building — now named after his younger brother, Dominic — is still in the DiMaggio family.
Recently, the DiMaggio building had a chance to play host to one of modern-day San Francisco's cultural and commercial commodities. A legal marijuana store, looking to be the first to operate in an area visited by more than 10 million tourists annually, had approached the family with a solid offer: a long-term lease, at well above the going rate in a market where T-shirt and souvenir hawkers already pay $40 to $60 per square foot.
When word of the potential new neighbor spread, however, the local merchants were so opposed that they went out and found the DiMaggio building an alternate tenant. Now, an outfit called "Rocket Fizz" — an "upscale soda and candy shop" — will open up in the ground floor of the DiMaggio building as early as this year.
This is the third time that would-be cannabis sellers have approached the wharf in the last year. This latest effort, led by former software salesman Romwold Connolly and called Krinze, has secured a lease in an old video camera store on Taylor Street, across the road from the longshoreman's union hall.
The fight over whether Connolly can secure a permit to sell marijuana is already fierce. Competing petitions have popped up on Change.org, and a showdown at the city's Planning Commission is scheduled for Dec. 17.
The controversy begs an unanswered question.
San Francisco's tourists smell cannabis, see it, and buy it in the street. Yet the wharf, one of the few places in San Francisco zoned for a dispensary, has successfully beaten back dispensaries for almost a decade.
What's behind the city's deep aversion to showing visitors how we do legal marijuana?
In downtown Denver, when you want to kill time before a Rockies game or walk off a meal at the Hard Rock Café, you can stroll along a pedestrian mall and, within a few blocks, find a merchant selling adults 21 and over recreational cannabis. In Denver, tourism and cannabis coexist.
For almost as long as the Haight was famous for hippies, San Francisco has been the intellectual and commercial capital of the cannabis industry. The legal marijuana enjoyed by more than half of Americans began with Dennis Peron's renegade cannabis club in the Castro in the 1980s. Our proximity to the state's cannabis-producing regions mean that the city is the de facto hub for the state's biggest cash crop, valued at over $16 billion.
And yet this is not a point of civic pride. Leaders in the Chamber of Commerce and in City Hall have long behaved as if San Francisco's place in the pot pantheon were a great municipal shame, akin to the downfall of Detroit. This may be why the city's cannabis dispensaries are generally located in lower-income, rundown parts of town: the places too politically weak to say no.
In 2006, the wharf successfully steered away a dispensary proposed by The Green Cross (which now does brisk business in the Excelsior).
The same opposition is out in force this time because, the merchants say, Fisherman's Wharf is supposed to be family-friendly. In-n-Out, the Rainforest Café, the Spy Shop — a marijuana retail outlet is an "awkward" fit among these kid-safe zones, says Troy Campbell, executive director of the wharf's Community Benefit District. Our tourists, he says, aren't marijuana users. (The weed you smell at the wharf? That comes from homeless people and gutter punks.)
It is true that adult fun is hard to find at Fisherman's Wharf: There are only a handful of bars and liquor stores, Campbell points out, and a troublesome nightclub a few blocks away was successfully shut down. (The shops selling t-shirts that promote marijuana use, for now, go unprotested.)
This conversation, of course, is happening before California is expected to entertain the question of legalized recreational marijuana. If the state legalizes, and there's a legal adult cannabis shop where millions of out-of-towners mill around, business will be beyond brisk.
This is also at least the third try for Connolly, Krinze's would-be CEO, to open up a dispensary. (Zoning defeated an effort in the Castro; an effort to rent in the Fifth and Mission Garage near downtown was felled by the landlord — the city's Municipal Transportation Agency.) He swears the out-of-towner market is not his focus, and that he just wants to give the 250,000 San Francisco residents who live in the northeast quadrant of town an alternative to going to dispensaries located in the Tenderloin, SoMa, or the Mission.
Whatever Connolly's motive, maneuvering into a future market that could measure in the millions is smart business. It is also unwelcome in San Francisco, where accepted weed tourism may remain a thing of the future even after it becomes legal.
Recently, the DiMaggio building had a chance to play host to one of modern-day San Francisco's cultural and commercial commodities. A legal marijuana store, looking to be the first to operate in an area visited by more than 10 million tourists annually, had approached the family with a solid offer: a long-term lease, at well above the going rate in a market where T-shirt and souvenir hawkers already pay $40 to $60 per square foot.
When word of the potential new neighbor spread, however, the local merchants were so opposed that they went out and found the DiMaggio building an alternate tenant. Now, an outfit called "Rocket Fizz" — an "upscale soda and candy shop" — will open up in the ground floor of the DiMaggio building as early as this year.
This is the third time that would-be cannabis sellers have approached the wharf in the last year. This latest effort, led by former software salesman Romwold Connolly and called Krinze, has secured a lease in an old video camera store on Taylor Street, across the road from the longshoreman's union hall.
The fight over whether Connolly can secure a permit to sell marijuana is already fierce. Competing petitions have popped up on Change.org, and a showdown at the city's Planning Commission is scheduled for Dec. 17.
The controversy begs an unanswered question.
San Francisco's tourists smell cannabis, see it, and buy it in the street. Yet the wharf, one of the few places in San Francisco zoned for a dispensary, has successfully beaten back dispensaries for almost a decade.
What's behind the city's deep aversion to showing visitors how we do legal marijuana?
In downtown Denver, when you want to kill time before a Rockies game or walk off a meal at the Hard Rock Café, you can stroll along a pedestrian mall and, within a few blocks, find a merchant selling adults 21 and over recreational cannabis. In Denver, tourism and cannabis coexist.
For almost as long as the Haight was famous for hippies, San Francisco has been the intellectual and commercial capital of the cannabis industry. The legal marijuana enjoyed by more than half of Americans began with Dennis Peron's renegade cannabis club in the Castro in the 1980s. Our proximity to the state's cannabis-producing regions mean that the city is the de facto hub for the state's biggest cash crop, valued at over $16 billion.
And yet this is not a point of civic pride. Leaders in the Chamber of Commerce and in City Hall have long behaved as if San Francisco's place in the pot pantheon were a great municipal shame, akin to the downfall of Detroit. This may be why the city's cannabis dispensaries are generally located in lower-income, rundown parts of town: the places too politically weak to say no.
In 2006, the wharf successfully steered away a dispensary proposed by The Green Cross (which now does brisk business in the Excelsior).
The same opposition is out in force this time because, the merchants say, Fisherman's Wharf is supposed to be family-friendly. In-n-Out, the Rainforest Café, the Spy Shop — a marijuana retail outlet is an "awkward" fit among these kid-safe zones, says Troy Campbell, executive director of the wharf's Community Benefit District. Our tourists, he says, aren't marijuana users. (The weed you smell at the wharf? That comes from homeless people and gutter punks.)
It is true that adult fun is hard to find at Fisherman's Wharf: There are only a handful of bars and liquor stores, Campbell points out, and a troublesome nightclub a few blocks away was successfully shut down. (The shops selling t-shirts that promote marijuana use, for now, go unprotested.)
This conversation, of course, is happening before California is expected to entertain the question of legalized recreational marijuana. If the state legalizes, and there's a legal adult cannabis shop where millions of out-of-towners mill around, business will be beyond brisk.
This is also at least the third try for Connolly, Krinze's would-be CEO, to open up a dispensary. (Zoning defeated an effort in the Castro; an effort to rent in the Fifth and Mission Garage near downtown was felled by the landlord — the city's Municipal Transportation Agency.) He swears the out-of-towner market is not his focus, and that he just wants to give the 250,000 San Francisco residents who live in the northeast quadrant of town an alternative to going to dispensaries located in the Tenderloin, SoMa, or the Mission.
Whatever Connolly's motive, maneuvering into a future market that could measure in the millions is smart business. It is also unwelcome in San Francisco, where accepted weed tourism may remain a thing of the future even after it becomes legal.
Tuesday, 13 October 2015
NETHERLANDS: New Marijuana Laws Are Changing Old Amsterdam
The last time Derrick Bergman came to Amsterdam to buy cannabis, he did so behind a locked door with a long, thick curtain obscuring his activity from the canal-lined residential street outside, in the quiet Lastage neighborhood. The secretary of the Netherlands’s Union for the Abolition of Cannabis Prohibition, Bergman comes here to weekly gatherings of a two-month-old—and seriously clandestine—“cannabis social club” called the Tree of Life, because it’s the only place in town he can find one of his favorite strains: Super Silver Haze.
Since 1976, authorities across the Netherlands have chosen to openly ignore that cannabis use is illegal here, and they prosecute no one in possession of less than five grams of marijuana for personal use. The policy, called gedoogbeleid, is known as the “Dutch model,” and it’s why hundreds of “coffee shops” sprung up across Amsterdam and the Netherlands, luring marijuana connoisseurs from across the globe to one of the few places they could roll and smoke a joint without fear. But that’s no longer the case.
Cannabis with more than 15 percent of the THC that makes it intoxicating is now under consideration to be reclassified as one of the “hard drugs” that come with stiff penalties. The government has also forced coffee shops where marijuana is sold to choose between alcohol and pot, prompting many to choose the former. Amsterdam once played host to nearly 300 coffee shops, of more than 1,000 scattered across the country. There are now fewer than 200 in the city and only 617 nationwide. While it’s always been illegal to grow marijuana in the Netherlands, authorities passively allow coffee shops to sell weed, often pretending not to know where the shops’ cannabis comes from.
New laws target even the smallest of marijuana growers in Holland. In the past, people could grow up to five plants without fear of retribution. In 2011, the government issued new police guidelines and declared anyone who grew with electric lights, prepared soil, “selected” seeds or ventilation would be considered “professional.” It’s a significant change, as professional growers risk major penalties, including eviction and blacklisting from the government-provided housing in which more than half of the country’s citizens reside.
The result: Coffee shops are increasingly buying buds from criminal organizations willing to absorb the risk of prosecution by growing large amounts of cannabis in shipping containers buried underground, with little regard for quality or mold abatement. “It’s amazing how bad the quality has become,” says Bergman. “And the price is up. It’s what we’ve all predicted.”
That’s why Bergman traveled from his native Eindhoven to Amsterdam on a recent Monday, both to convene with other activists and to pick up five grams (the legal limit) of Super Silver Haze. Because the club is not-for-profit, its members can focus their efforts on finding and buying the best product and providing it to their members at much better prices than the coffee shops.
Modeled after a proliferation of similar establishments in Spain, the social clubs offer a new way to subvert the harsher laws. As in Holland, cannabis is illegal in Spain, but the government doesn’t prosecute anyone for personal consumption and there’s no implicit limit on the number of plants a person can grow, meaning the government doesn’t care if you grow one plant or 15. In fact, signs point to the government not caring at all. Barcelona is developing a reputation as “the new Amsterdam,” meaning the old Amsterdam is losing out on a significant source of revenue: drug tourists.
A doll wearing a t-shirt with pictures of the Dutch Royal family is seen in a cannabis shop in Amsterdam
Inside an Amsterdam coffee shop called The Rookies, 22-year-old John Bell rolls a spliff of tobacco and a strain called Dutch Kashmir, which Bell can’t find in his native Liverpool. Bell has been to Amsterdam 11 times in the past three years, not because it’s hard to find weed in the U.K., but because the quality here is better. He wouldn’t visit the city at all if not for these coffee shops and Amsterdam’s quasi-legal cannabis, adding: “It’s too expensive to drink here, for a proper night out.”
Such drug tourists represent a major element of the city’s economy. The union of coffee shops in Maastricht commissioned research in 2008 that found foreign visitors to the city’s coffee shops spent money in other businesses there as well: €140 million (approximately $170 million) annually. It’s a significant number and one of the reasons government officials in Amsterdam have fought to keep the coffee shops from going out of business.
About a third of all visitors to Amsterdam step into one of its coffee shops at some point; nationally, the number is one in five. Banning such visitors would hit tourism revenues hard, chasing off travelers who tend to be well-behaved. “If you’re really a deadbeat hippie punk, a no-money kind of guy, how are you going to afford a ticket to Amsterdam?” Bergman says.
Cities such as Maastricht, on the other hand, have banned foreigners from coffee shops since 2005. The result, insists Bergman and other critics, is a proliferation of street dealers. People still come from neighboring countries to score marijuana, but now they stock up and head back home in a day, instead of spending any time in local hotels and restaurants.
How did Holland get here? Some trace the backlash to 9/11. The world’s global panic about terrorism in the wake of the attacks on New York City and Washington led to a surge in the power of conservative political parties in places as far away as the Netherlands. Ever since Holland’s People’s Party for Liberty and Democracy began to consolidate influence here, its leaders have pushed for zero tolerance drug laws. “Our last prime minister [Jan Peter Balkenende] believed in his heart that weed comes from Satan,” says Mila Jansen, a legendary figure in Amsterdam, who once invented a way to make hash in a washing machine.
Other factors influencing the government crackdown are pressure from outside nations, especially France, which has pushed the International Narcotics Control board to sanction Holland for violating international treaties on drug laws with its permissive pot policy. Ironic, argues Bergman, because the rate of marijuana use is twice as high in France as it is in the Netherlands, and Holland has one of the lowest number of drug-related deaths in Europe.
“Hard drugs are still illegal in Holland, but we also see that there are still many people who want to try drugs on occasion,” said the city’s mayor, Eberhard van der Laan, in a statement.
“This is a reality we cannot ignore. And this is one of the key principles to our country’s drug policies: Drug use is first and foremost an issue of public health. By not focusing on the criminal aspects of drug use, as is the case in many other countries, we can be more effective when it comes to informing the public, testing drugs and prevention.”
Unfortunately, van der Laan’s federal counterparts don’t agree. They also don’t see that prohibition amounts to little more than, as they say here, “mopping with the tap on.”
Now, activists like Bergman are trying to convince Holland to consider the American model—the legalization and regulation of all components of marijuana cultivation and sale. Citing Oregon’s law, which allows residents to grow as many as four plants, Bergman says: “I’m sort of jealous.”
That’s because America seems to be learning from Holland’s mistakes. Holland’s passive-aggressive policy doesn’t stop illicit activity or drug tourism or make anyone safer, say activists: It actually has the reverse effect. Quasi-legalization leaves too many entry points for criminals to line their own pockets from the drug trade. State by state, the U.S. is legalizing pot with initiatives that clearly spell out who is allowed to manufacture, distribute and consume it. That’s the key to a successful policy, and it’s one Dutch activists are now working to implement in their own country, before things swing too far the other way.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



